On August 27, 2026, ServiceNow released security updates for four vulnerabilities affecting its ServiceNow AI Platform and Now Platform. Three of these vulnerabilities are rated critical with a CVSS score of 10.0 out of 10.0. These flaws—a code injection (CVE-2026-18885), an improper access control flaw (CVE-2026-18886), and a SQL injection (CVE-2026-74820)—can be exploited by an unauthenticated remote attacker in low-complexity attacks. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution, full privilege escalation, and complete database control. Given that ServiceNow's platforms underpin critical business operations for a majority of Fortune 500 companies, the potential impact is severe. ServiceNow has patched its hosted instances and provided updates for on-premise customers. No active exploitation has been reported.
The three critical vulnerabilities pose a significant threat due to their high impact and ease of exploitation:
ORDER BY clause. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this to execute arbitrary SQL commands, enabling them to read, modify, or delete data from the underlying database.A fourth, high-severity vulnerability, CVE-2026-6876 (CVSS 8.7), was also patched. This flaw is a sandbox escape in the Now Platform that could also permit arbitrary code execution.
All three critical flaws were assigned the CVSS 4.0 vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H, signifying a network-based attack with no privileges or user interaction required, and a high impact on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of both the vulnerable platform and logically separate systems.
The vulnerabilities affect multiple versions of the ServiceNow AI and Now Platforms. Organizations using self-hosted (on-premise) instances must apply patches manually. The following versions are impacted:
ServiceNow has already applied the necessary security updates to all its cloud-hosted customer instances.
As of the disclosure on August 28, 2026, ServiceNow has stated that it is not aware of any malicious exploitation of these vulnerabilities in the wild. However, the publication of these details, combined with the critical 10.0 CVSS scores, significantly increases the likelihood of threat actors developing and deploying exploits. The low attack complexity makes these flaws prime targets for widespread scanning and automated attacks.
A successful exploit of any of the three critical vulnerabilities would grant an attacker complete control over a ServiceNow instance. This could lead to:
Given that 85% of Fortune 500 companies use ServiceNow, a widespread exploitation campaign could have significant economic and operational consequences across multiple industries.
The following patterns may help identify vulnerable or compromised systems:
Security teams should monitor for unusual activity related to the following components:
/api/now/graphql/sys_attachment.doServiceNow System LogsORDER BY clauses in queries, which may indicate attempts to exploit CVE-2026-74820.node or javaSecurity teams should implement the following detection and response strategies:
Log Analysis: Ingest and analyze ServiceNow transaction logs, system logs, and web server access logs. Look for requests to the GraphQL Composite Data API from unknown or suspicious IP addresses. Hunt for unusual file upload activities, especially those involving non-image file types or unexpected file names being uploaded via the image processor. For CVE-2026-74820, filter logs for SQL-related errors or queries with complex, nested ORDER BY statements that appear anomalous. D3FEND's File Analysis and Network Traffic Analysis are relevant here.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR): On self-hosted ServiceNow servers, monitor for suspicious process execution. The ServiceNow application runs on Java and Node.js; any unexpected child processes spawned from these, such as shells (sh, bash, powershell.exe) or network utility tools (curl, wget), are strong indicators of compromise.
Network Monitoring: Monitor network traffic to and from ServiceNow instances. A sudden increase in outbound traffic or connections to unusual IP addresses could indicate data exfiltration following a compromise.
Immediate action is required for all self-hosted customers.
Patch Immediately: The primary mitigation is to apply the security patches released by ServiceNow as soon as possible. This is a critical application of D3FEND's Software Update countermeasure.
Restrict Access: As a temporary compensating control if patching is delayed, restrict network access to ServiceNow instances. Ensure that management interfaces are not exposed to the public internet. Access should be limited to trusted internal networks and administrative jump boxes. This aligns with D3FEND's Network Isolation principle.
Web Application Firewall (WAF): Deploy a WAF with rules designed to inspect and block malicious GraphQL and SQL injection patterns. While not a substitute for patching, a properly configured WAF can provide a valuable layer of defense against exploitation attempts.
Regular Audits: Regularly audit ServiceNow configurations, user roles, and permissions to ensure adherence to the principle of least privilege. This can help limit the impact of a potential compromise.
New critical RCE vulnerability (CVE-2026-74944) identified, replacing a previously listed RCE. Advisory also highlights past exploitation of a different ServiceNow CVE.
The initial report of critical ServiceNow vulnerabilities has been updated with a new CVE ID for one of the remote code execution flaws. CVE-2026-74944, a file upload RCE, is now listed instead of CVE-2026-18885. Both are CVSS 10.0. The updated advisory also provides additional context, noting that a separate ServiceNow vulnerability (CVE-2026-6875) was actively exploited in July 2026, underscoring the urgency for patching these critical flaws. Affected versions now include 'Australia Patch 5' and earlier.
ServiceNow releases security patches for four vulnerabilities, including three with a CVSS score of 10.0.

Cybersecurity professional with over 10 years of specialized experience in security operations, threat intelligence, incident response, and security automation. Expertise spans SOAR/XSOAR orchestration, threat intelligence platforms, SIEM/UEBA analytics, and building cyber fusion centers. Background includes technical enablement, solution architecture for enterprise and government clients, and implementing security automation workflows across IR, TIP, and SOC use cases.
CyberNetSec.io uses automation to assist source monitoring, deduplication, observable extraction, and structured intelligence generation. Published analysis follows human-defined editorial standards and adds defensive context including MITRE ATT&CK, D3FEND, STIX, and Sigma where applicable. Read our editorial policy.
Help others stay informed about cybersecurity threats
Every tactic, technique, and sub-technique used in this threat has been identified and mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework for consistent, actionable threat language.
Observables and indicators of compromise (IOCs) have been extracted and cataloged. Risk has been assessed and correlated with known threat actors and historical campaigns.
Detection rules, incident response steps, and D3FEND-aligned mitigation strategies are included so your team can act on this intelligence immediately.
Structured threat data is packaged as a STIX 2.1 bundle and can be visualized as an interactive graph — relationships between actors, malware, techniques, and indicators.
Sigma detection rules are derived from the threat techniques in this article and can be converted for deployment across any major SIEM or EDR platform.