On August 27, 2026, security firm VulnCheck disclosed the discovery of two new backdoors in routers manufactured by the Chinese company Shenzhen Zhibotong Electronics Co. (ZBT). The backdoors, named Darklantern and Speakingstone, were found in over a dozen router models sold worldwide as white-label products, including under the Zbtlink brand. These implants provide attackers with remote, privileged access to the device and the network it manages, enabling potential surveillance and traffic manipulation. This discovery follows the firm's earlier report on the 'Endlessdoors' backdoor in other ZBT routers, suggesting a long-standing and deliberate practice of embedding surveillance capabilities into the hardware's firmware. The findings highlight significant supply chain risks associated with globally distributed networking equipment.
The newly discovered backdoors, Darklantern and Speakingstone, are described as earlier iterations of the previously reported Endlessdoors implant. They provide a persistent, covert mechanism for remote access.
The routers are manufactured by ZBT in China and sold globally under many different brand names, making it difficult for consumers and businesses to identify if their device is affected. The researcher, Jacob Baines, discovered the new backdoors on a ZBT router sold under the brand name 'DeepOrange'.
The backdoors are embedded within the router's firmware, making them persistent across reboots. They provide a level of access that bypasses all standard authentication and security controls on the device.
T1542.001 - Pre-OS Boot: System Firmware: The backdoors are embedded in the device firmware, ensuring they persist even if the device is reset to factory settings.T1562.001 - Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools: The firmware's firewall is intentionally configured to allow access to the backdoor's listening port.T1219 - Remote Access Software: The backdoors provide a covert remote access channel for an attacker.T1005 - Data from Local System: Once connected, an attacker can access information on the router and the local network it manages.The presence of these backdoors in widely distributed consumer and small business routers constitutes a major supply chain security risk.
Zbtlink's previous claim that the 'Endlessdoors' backdoor was for "legitimate remote support" is contradicted by the covert and insecure nature of these implants.
The following patterns may help identify vulnerable or compromised systems:
UDP/38686ZBT- or ZbtlinkInbound UDP to high portPort Scanning: Scan the external (WAN) interface of routers from an external network. Check for any unexpected open UDP or TCP ports, particularly UDP/38686.
Firmware Analysis: For advanced users, extracting and analyzing the router's firmware image can reveal the presence of the backdoor binaries and firewall rules.
Network Traffic Analysis: Although 'Darklantern' is passive, monitoring all traffic at a higher network layer (e.g., ISP level) could reveal inbound connection attempts to the backdoor port. This is a key application of D3FEND's Network Traffic Analysis.
Due to the nature of firmware-based backdoors, mitigation options for end-users are limited.
Replace the Device: The most effective mitigation is to replace the affected router with a device from a trusted, reputable manufacturer that has a strong track record for security.
Install Third-Party Firmware: For some router models, it may be possible to overwrite the vendor's firmware with a trusted open-source alternative like OpenWrt or DD-WRT. This would completely remove the malicious code. However, this is a technical process that carries the risk of 'bricking' the device.
Upstream Firewall: Place a firewall upstream from the Zbtlink router (e.g., at the modem or ISP gateway) and configure it to block all unsolicited inbound traffic, including to the backdoor's UDP port. This can act as a compensating control but does not remove the backdoor itself.
Using an upstream firewall to block unsolicited inbound connections to the router can prevent external access to the backdoor.
Mapped D3FEND Techniques:
Replacing the compromised firmware with a trusted open-source alternative like OpenWrt removes the backdoor entirely.
While not user-configurable, manufacturers can implement secure boot processes to prevent unauthorized firmware modifications.
Mapped D3FEND Techniques:
For users and small businesses unable to immediately replace a suspected Zbtlink router, the most practical defense is to implement strict inbound traffic filtering using an upstream device. This involves placing another firewall (which could be part of a modem or a dedicated security appliance) between the internet and the Zbtlink router's WAN port. This upstream firewall should be configured with a default-deny policy for all inbound traffic. Specifically, create a rule to explicitly block any inbound traffic to UDP port 38686, which is used by the 'Darklantern' backdoor. This countermeasure does not remove the backdoor from the router but effectively blinds it from the internet, preventing external attackers from initiating a connection to it. It acts as a crucial compensating control to mitigate the immediate threat of remote surveillance.
The ultimate solution to a firmware-level backdoor is to replace the compromised software. For technically proficient users, this involves replacing the entire Zbtlink firmware with a trusted, open-source alternative such as OpenWrt or DD-WRT. This process, known as 'flashing,' completely overwrites the device's operating system, removing the 'Darklantern' and 'Speakingstone' implants and any other hidden vendor code. Before attempting this, users must verify that their specific router model is supported by the open-source firmware project to avoid rendering the device unusable. While this is the most thorough technical solution, the most reliable and accessible mitigation for most users is to physically replace the device with one from a manufacturer with a transparent and verifiable commitment to security.
VulnCheck discloses the discovery of the 'Darklantern' and 'Speakingstone' backdoors in Zbtlink routers.

Cybersecurity professional with over 10 years of specialized experience in security operations, threat intelligence, incident response, and security automation. Expertise spans SOAR/XSOAR orchestration, threat intelligence platforms, SIEM/UEBA analytics, and building cyber fusion centers. Background includes technical enablement, solution architecture for enterprise and government clients, and implementing security automation workflows across IR, TIP, and SOC use cases.
CyberNetSec.io uses automation to assist source monitoring, deduplication, observable extraction, and structured intelligence generation. Published analysis follows human-defined editorial standards and adds defensive context including MITRE ATT&CK, D3FEND, STIX, and Sigma where applicable. Read our editorial policy.
Help others stay informed about cybersecurity threats
Every tactic, technique, and sub-technique used in this threat has been identified and mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework for consistent, actionable threat language.
Observables and indicators of compromise (IOCs) have been extracted and cataloged. Risk has been assessed and correlated with known threat actors and historical campaigns.
Detection rules, incident response steps, and D3FEND-aligned mitigation strategies are included so your team can act on this intelligence immediately.
Structured threat data is packaged as a STIX 2.1 bundle and can be visualized as an interactive graph — relationships between actors, malware, techniques, and indicators.
Sigma detection rules are derived from the threat techniques in this article and can be converted for deployment across any major SIEM or EDR platform.