Massive Snowflake Data Breach Impacts 165 Organizations After Attackers Bypass MFA with Stolen Credentials

Snowflake Cloud Platform Breach Hits 165 Customers, Including Ticketmaster and Santander

CRITICAL
June 7, 2026
7m read
Data BreachCloud SecurityCyberattack

Impact Scope

People Affected

Data of 165 organizations' customers

Affected Companies

TicketmasterSantander Bank

Industries Affected

TechnologyFinanceMedia and EntertainmentTelecommunications

Related Entities

Other

Snowflake TicketmasterSantander BankAT&TLoan Depot

Full Report

Executive Summary

A widespread and damaging security breach has occurred involving the cloud data platform Snowflake, leading to the compromise of sensitive data for at least 165 of its customers. The attack was not a breach of Snowflake's core platform but rather a targeted campaign against its customers using stolen credentials. Threat actors used credentials, likely harvested from infostealer malware infections on non-corporate systems, to log into customer Snowflake instances. High-profile victims confirmed to be affected include Ticketmaster and Santander Bank. The incident is a stark illustration of the catastrophic impact of credential compromise in the cloud and underscores the limitations of certain forms of multi-factor authentication (MFA) when not properly configured or enforced.


Threat Overview

The attack campaign appears to be focused and systematic. Threat actors have been purchasing large volumes of stolen credentials from infostealer malware logs available on the dark web. They then automated the process of testing these credentials against Snowflake login endpoints. The key failure point was that many of the compromised accounts were not protected by MFA. For accounts that were, some reports suggest the attackers were able to bypass it, though the mechanism is not yet fully clearβ€”it may involve session hijacking or the use of stolen cookies.

Once logged in, the attackers had the same level of access as the legitimate user, allowing them to query databases, access sensitive customer data, and exfiltrate it to their own storage. This incident is part of a broader, alarming trend, with cloud breaches accounting for 45% of all cybersecurity incidents this year. The average cost of such a breach has reached $4.88 million, and with an average containment time of 207 days, attackers have a long window to operate undetected.


Technical Analysis

The attack chain is straightforward but devastatingly effective:

  1. Credential Acquisition: Attackers acquire credentials (username/password pairs) from third-party sources, primarily logs from infostealer malware like Vidar, Lumma, or Redline (T1589.002). These are often stolen from employees' personal or unmanaged devices.
  2. Initial Access: The attackers use automated scripts to perform credential stuffing attacks against Snowflake's login interface (T1110.003). They successfully log in to accounts that reuse passwords and are not protected by MFA.
  3. Defense Evasion (MFA Bypass): For some accounts, attackers may have bypassed MFA. This could be through session token theft (T1539) from the same infostealer logs, or by exploiting poorly configured MFA policies that did not apply to all access methods.
  4. Discovery: Once inside, attackers perform reconnaissance to understand the data available, listing databases, tables, and schemas (T1087.004).
  5. Exfiltration: The attackers exfiltrate large volumes of sensitive data from the customer's Snowflake instance to attacker-controlled storage (T1537).

Critical Insight: Snowflake has stated its platform was not breached. The vulnerability lies in customer-side security practices: lack of MFA, poor credential hygiene, and failure to monitor for anomalous access patterns. The incident highlights the shared responsibility model in cloud security.

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

Tactic
Resource Development
Technique ID
T1589.002
Technique Name
Gather Victim Identity Information: Credentials
Description
Attackers purchase credentials stolen by infostealer malware.
Tactic
Initial Access
Technique ID
T1078.004
Technique Name
Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts
Description
Attackers log in using the stolen, legitimate customer credentials.
Tactic
Initial Access
Technique ID
T1110.003
Technique Name
Brute Force: Password Spraying
Description
The automated testing of stolen credentials against the login portal is a form of credential stuffing/spraying.
Tactic
Defense Evasion
Technique ID
T1539
Technique Name
Steal Web Session Cookie
Description
A possible method for bypassing MFA if session cookies were stolen along with passwords.
Tactic
Discovery
Technique ID
T1087.004
Technique Name
Account Discovery: Cloud Account
Description
After logging in, attackers enumerate resources and data available to the compromised account.
Tactic
Exfiltration
Technique ID
T1537
Technique Name
Transfer Data to Cloud Account
Description
Attackers exfiltrate data from the victim's Snowflake instance to their own cloud storage.

Impact Assessment

The impact on the 165 affected organizations is catastrophic. They face massive data breaches, involving the personal and financial information of potentially millions of their own customers (as seen with Ticketmaster). The consequences include enormous regulatory fines (e.g., under GDPR or CCPA), costly incident response and forensic efforts, customer lawsuits, and severe, long-lasting reputational damage. For Santander Bank, a financial institution, the breach could undermine customer trust in its security. The incident serves as a wake-up call for all companies using cloud data warehouses, demonstrating that simply migrating data to the cloud without a corresponding uplift in security posture and monitoring is a recipe for disaster.


IOCs β€” Directly from Articles

No specific IOCs were provided in the source articles.


Cyber Observables β€” Hunting Hints

Security teams using Snowflake should hunt for the following activity:

Type
log_source
Value
Snowflake Access History
Description
Look for logins from unusual IP addresses, user agents, or geographic locations not associated with your workforce.
Context
Snowflake Query History, SIEM
Type
string_pattern
Value
CLIENT_IP
Description
Correlate login IPs against a list of known malicious IPs or non-corporate VPN/proxy services.
Context
Snowflake LOGIN_HISTORY view
Type
command_line_pattern
Value
COPY INTO @...
Description
Monitor for large data copy operations to external stages, especially newly created ones.
Context
Snowflake Query History
Type
user_account_pattern
Value
(multiple failures, one success)
Description
A classic sign of credential stuffing: multiple failed login attempts from one IP across many users, followed by a successful login.
Context
Snowflake LOGIN_HISTORY view, SIEM alerts

Detection & Response

Detection:

  1. Monitor Login History: Continuously analyze Snowflake's LOGIN_HISTORY and QUERY_HISTORY views. Ingest these logs into a SIEM and build alerts for:
    • Logins from unexpected IP ranges or ASNs.
    • Logins from users who have been inactive for a long time.
    • A user logging in from multiple, geographically impossible locations in a short time.
  2. Behavioral Analytics (UEBA): Implement User and Entity Behavior Analytics to baseline normal user query patterns. Alert on deviations, such as a user who normally queries small marketing tables suddenly attempting to download an entire customer database.
  3. Data Exfiltration Alerts: Monitor for the creation of new external stages or large COPY INTO commands that indicate mass data exfiltration.

Response:

  1. Force Logout and Reset: If a compromise is suspected, immediately force a logout of the user session and reset their password.
  2. Isolate and Disable: Disable the compromised user account to prevent further access.
  3. Review Query History: Analyze the query history for the compromised user to determine exactly what data was accessed and exfiltrated.
  4. Engage Snowflake Support: Contact Snowflake support to report the incident and request assistance in the investigation.

Mitigation

Strategic Mitigation:

  • Multi-factor Authentication (M1032): Enforce phishing-resistant MFA for ALL users, including service accounts. This is the single most critical mitigation. Do not rely on MFA that can be bypassed by session cookie theft.
  • Network Segmentation (M1030): Implement network policies in Snowflake to restrict access to a specific allowlist of corporate IP addresses. This would have blocked logins from the attackers' infrastructure.
  • Privileged Account Management (M1026): Apply the principle of least privilege. User accounts should only have access to the specific data they need to perform their job. Avoid granting broad access to entire databases.

Tactical Mitigation:

  1. Disable Inactive Users: Regularly review and disable accounts for users who have left the company or no longer require access.
  2. Credential Hygiene: Educate users on the importance of not reusing passwords and using a password manager.
  3. Monitor for Leaked Credentials: Use a service to monitor the dark web for credentials belonging to your organization and force password resets when they are found.

Timeline of Events

1
June 7, 2026
This article was published

MITRE ATT&CK Mitigations

Enforcing MFA on all Snowflake accounts is the most critical mitigation to prevent credential stuffing attacks.

Use Snowflake Network Policies to restrict access to a whitelist of trusted corporate IP addresses.

Apply least privilege access controls to ensure users can only access the data necessary for their roles.

Continuously monitor and audit Snowflake access and query logs to detect anomalous behavior.

Article Author

Jason Gomes

Jason Gomes

β€’ Cybersecurity Practitioner

Cybersecurity professional with over 10 years of specialized experience in security operations, threat intelligence, incident response, and security automation. Expertise spans SOAR/XSOAR orchestration, threat intelligence platforms, SIEM/UEBA analytics, and building cyber fusion centers. Background includes technical enablement, solution architecture for enterprise and government clients, and implementing security automation workflows across IR, TIP, and SOC use cases.

Threat Intelligence & AnalysisSecurity Orchestration (SOAR/XSOAR)Incident Response & Digital ForensicsSecurity Operations Center (SOC)SIEM & Security AnalyticsCyber Fusion & Threat SharingSecurity Automation & IntegrationManaged Detection & Response (MDR)

Tags

Snowflakedata breachcloud securityTicketmasterSantandercredential stuffingMFA

πŸ“’ Share This Article

Help others stay informed about cybersecurity threats

🎯 MITRE ATT&CK Mapped

Every tactic, technique, and sub-technique used in this threat has been identified and mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework for consistent, actionable threat language.

🧠 Enriched & Analyzed

Observables and indicators of compromise (IOCs) have been extracted and cataloged. Risk has been assessed and correlated with known threat actors and historical campaigns.

πŸ›‘οΈ Actionable Guidance

Detection rules, incident response steps, and D3FEND-aligned mitigation strategies are included so your team can act on this intelligence immediately.

πŸ”— STIX Visualizer

Structured threat data is packaged as a STIX 2.1 bundle and can be visualized as an interactive graph β€” relationships between actors, malware, techniques, and indicators.

⚑ Sigma Generator

Sigma detection rules are derived from the threat techniques in this article and can be converted for deployment across any major SIEM or EDR platform.