Data of 165 organizations' customers
A widespread and damaging security breach has occurred involving the cloud data platform Snowflake, leading to the compromise of sensitive data for at least 165 of its customers. The attack was not a breach of Snowflake's core platform but rather a targeted campaign against its customers using stolen credentials. Threat actors used credentials, likely harvested from infostealer malware infections on non-corporate systems, to log into customer Snowflake instances. High-profile victims confirmed to be affected include Ticketmaster and Santander Bank. The incident is a stark illustration of the catastrophic impact of credential compromise in the cloud and underscores the limitations of certain forms of multi-factor authentication (MFA) when not properly configured or enforced.
The attack campaign appears to be focused and systematic. Threat actors have been purchasing large volumes of stolen credentials from infostealer malware logs available on the dark web. They then automated the process of testing these credentials against Snowflake login endpoints. The key failure point was that many of the compromised accounts were not protected by MFA. For accounts that were, some reports suggest the attackers were able to bypass it, though the mechanism is not yet fully clearβit may involve session hijacking or the use of stolen cookies.
Once logged in, the attackers had the same level of access as the legitimate user, allowing them to query databases, access sensitive customer data, and exfiltrate it to their own storage. This incident is part of a broader, alarming trend, with cloud breaches accounting for 45% of all cybersecurity incidents this year. The average cost of such a breach has reached $4.88 million, and with an average containment time of 207 days, attackers have a long window to operate undetected.
The attack chain is straightforward but devastatingly effective:
T1589.002). These are often stolen from employees' personal or unmanaged devices.T1110.003). They successfully log in to accounts that reuse passwords and are not protected by MFA.T1539) from the same infostealer logs, or by exploiting poorly configured MFA policies that did not apply to all access methods.T1087.004).T1537).Critical Insight: Snowflake has stated its platform was not breached. The vulnerability lies in customer-side security practices: lack of MFA, poor credential hygiene, and failure to monitor for anomalous access patterns. The incident highlights the shared responsibility model in cloud security.
T1589.002T1078.004T1110.003T1539T1087.004T1537The impact on the 165 affected organizations is catastrophic. They face massive data breaches, involving the personal and financial information of potentially millions of their own customers (as seen with Ticketmaster). The consequences include enormous regulatory fines (e.g., under GDPR or CCPA), costly incident response and forensic efforts, customer lawsuits, and severe, long-lasting reputational damage. For Santander Bank, a financial institution, the breach could undermine customer trust in its security. The incident serves as a wake-up call for all companies using cloud data warehouses, demonstrating that simply migrating data to the cloud without a corresponding uplift in security posture and monitoring is a recipe for disaster.
No specific IOCs were provided in the source articles.
Security teams using Snowflake should hunt for the following activity:
log_sourceSnowflake Access Historystring_patternCLIENT_IPLOGIN_HISTORY viewcommand_line_patternCOPY INTO @...user_account_pattern(multiple failures, one success)LOGIN_HISTORY view, SIEM alertsDetection:
LOGIN_HISTORY and QUERY_HISTORY views. Ingest these logs into a SIEM and build alerts for:COPY INTO commands that indicate mass data exfiltration.Response:
Strategic Mitigation:
Tactical Mitigation:
Enforcing MFA on all Snowflake accounts is the most critical mitigation to prevent credential stuffing attacks.
Use Snowflake Network Policies to restrict access to a whitelist of trusted corporate IP addresses.
Apply least privilege access controls to ensure users can only access the data necessary for their roles.

Cybersecurity professional with over 10 years of specialized experience in security operations, threat intelligence, incident response, and security automation. Expertise spans SOAR/XSOAR orchestration, threat intelligence platforms, SIEM/UEBA analytics, and building cyber fusion centers. Background includes technical enablement, solution architecture for enterprise and government clients, and implementing security automation workflows across IR, TIP, and SOC use cases.
Help others stay informed about cybersecurity threats
Every tactic, technique, and sub-technique used in this threat has been identified and mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework for consistent, actionable threat language.
Observables and indicators of compromise (IOCs) have been extracted and cataloged. Risk has been assessed and correlated with known threat actors and historical campaigns.
Detection rules, incident response steps, and D3FEND-aligned mitigation strategies are included so your team can act on this intelligence immediately.
Structured threat data is packaged as a STIX 2.1 bundle and can be visualized as an interactive graph β relationships between actors, malware, techniques, and indicators.
Sigma detection rules are derived from the threat techniques in this article and can be converted for deployment across any major SIEM or EDR platform.