In a sophisticated supply chain attack, the hacktivist group Head Mare has been observed breaching unpatched TrueConf video conferencing servers to distribute trojanized software. According to research from Kaspersky, the attackers exploit a chain of two vulnerabilities to gain full system control, then replace legitimate, signed client installers with malicious, unsigned versions. These trojanized installers deploy backdoors known as PhantomCore and PhantomGraph. The attack targets users of the compromised servers, who download the malicious software believing it to be a legitimate update. The campaign primarily affects organizations in Russia, where TrueConf is a popular alternative to Western conferencing platforms, and highlights the significant risk of unpatched on-premise software.
This is a classic server-side supply chain attack. Instead of compromising the vendor's central build environment, the attackers compromise individual, internet-facing instances of the software. When users of that specific company connect to their own server to download the client, they receive the malicious version. This makes the attack highly targeted and difficult to detect for those outside the compromised organization.
The attack proceeds in several distinct stages:
4307.KLCERT-26-057 and KLCERT-26-058. This exploit chain allows them to break out of the application's isolated environment and achieve NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM privileges on the underlying Windows host. This is a critical step, as it gives them full control of the server. This corresponds to Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068).\public\js\locale.php. This provides them with persistent remote access to the server's file system and allows them to execute commands, a form of Server Software Component: Web Shell (T1505.003).The impact is severe for organizations running compromised TrueConf servers. Every user who downloads the client from that server becomes a potential victim. This can lead to widespread internal network compromise, theft of sensitive corporate data, and credential harvesting. Since TrueConf is often used in government and enterprise environments for secure communications, the data being discussed in these meetings could be of high value. The use of a secondary backdoor that exfiltrates LSASS credentials indicates an intent to move laterally and compromise the broader network.
No specific IP addresses, domains, or file hashes were provided in the source articles.
Security teams may want to hunt for the following patterns to identify related activity:
\public\js\locale.php4307w3wp.exe or httpd.execmd.exe or powershell.exe.onedrive.live.com from serverslocale.php. D3FEND's System File Analysis (D3-SFA) is relevant here.4307 to only trusted IP addresses. Do not expose these services directly to the public internet if possible.New details emerge on Head Mare's TrueConf supply chain attack, including specific affected server versions, patch release date, and targeted sectors.
Applying the latest security patches from TrueConf is the most effective way to prevent the initial exploitation.
Mapped D3FEND Techniques:
Restrict network access to the TrueConf server's management ports, limiting the attack surface available to external threats.
Mapped D3FEND Techniques:
Enforce policies that only allow the execution of properly signed software, which would prevent the unsigned trojanized client from running.
Use endpoint security solutions to detect and block known malware like PhantomCore and PhantomGraph, and to detect suspicious behaviors like LSASS dumping.
The root cause of this supply chain attack is the exploitation of unpatched TrueConf servers. The primary and most effective countermeasure is to maintain a rigorous patch management program for all internet-facing infrastructure. Organizations using TrueConf must immediately identify all server instances and upgrade them to a patched version (5.3.9, 5.4.9, or 5.5.5 and later). This action closes the initial access vector used by the Head Mare group, preventing them from gaining SYSTEM-level privileges and planting their web shell. A continuous vulnerability management program should be in place to ensure that patches for critical, internet-facing systems are applied on an emergency basis.
To detect the persistence mechanism used in this attack, organizations should implement File Integrity Monitoring (FIM) on their TrueConf servers. A FIM solution should be configured to specifically monitor the \public\js\locale.php file, as well as other core application directories. The system should generate a high-priority alert whenever this file is modified. Since this file is a static component of the application, any change is highly suspicious and indicative of a web shell being planted. This provides a high-fidelity signal of compromise, allowing incident response teams to intervene before the attackers can replace the client installers.
A key failure point in this attack is the user's workstation executing an unsigned binary. Organizations should enforce policies that verify the digital signatures of all executables. This can be achieved through application control solutions like AppLocker or third-party tools. A strict policy should be configured to block the execution of any unsigned executables, especially those downloaded from the internet or internal servers. In the context of this attack, when a user downloads the trojanized, unsigned TrueConf client, the policy would prevent it from running, thereby stopping the infection at the endpoint. This breaks the attack chain at the final, critical stage.
Kaspersky researchers discover the Head Mare campaign targeting TrueConf servers.

Cybersecurity professional with over 10 years of specialized experience in security operations, threat intelligence, incident response, and security automation. Expertise spans SOAR/XSOAR orchestration, threat intelligence platforms, SIEM/UEBA analytics, and building cyber fusion centers. Background includes technical enablement, solution architecture for enterprise and government clients, and implementing security automation workflows across IR, TIP, and SOC use cases.
CyberNetSec.io uses automation to assist source monitoring, deduplication, observable extraction, and structured intelligence generation. Published analysis follows human-defined editorial standards and adds defensive context including MITRE ATT&CK, D3FEND, STIX, and Sigma where applicable. Read our editorial policy.
Help others stay informed about cybersecurity threats
Every tactic, technique, and sub-technique used in this threat has been identified and mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework for consistent, actionable threat language.
Observables and indicators of compromise (IOCs) have been extracted and cataloged. Risk has been assessed and correlated with known threat actors and historical campaigns.
Detection rules, incident response steps, and D3FEND-aligned mitigation strategies are included so your team can act on this intelligence immediately.
Structured threat data is packaged as a STIX 2.1 bundle and can be visualized as an interactive graph — relationships between actors, malware, techniques, and indicators.
Sigma detection rules are derived from the threat techniques in this article and can be converted for deployment across any major SIEM or EDR platform.