Governments Consider Ransomware Payment Bans

Governments Move Toward Banning Ransomware Payments Amid Rising Attacks

INFORMATIONAL
July 20, 2026
4m read
Policy and ComplianceRegulatoryRansomware

Related Entities

Organizations

Government of the United Kingdom

Full Report

Executive Summary

In a significant policy shift to combat the escalating ransomware crisis, governments worldwide are increasingly moving towards prohibiting ransom payments. A July 20, 2026, report indicates that this trend is gaining traction, with the United Kingdom planning to implement a ban on such payments for public sector bodies and operators of critical national infrastructure. This legislative approach aims to dismantle the profitable business model of ransomware gangs by cutting off their revenue stream. However, it also creates a complex dilemma for victim organizations, who may be left without recourse if they cannot recover data from backups.


Regulatory Details

The proposed and implemented bans represent a strategic effort to make ransomware a less profitable criminal enterprise. The planned UK ban is a key example, targeting government agencies and critical infrastructure sectors like energy, transportation, and healthcare. The rationale is that these sectors are high-value targets, and preventing them from paying ransoms will disincentivize attacks against them.

This trend is a response to the explosive growth of the ransomware ecosystem, which has evolved into a sophisticated, corporate-style industry. Confirmed ransomware victims reportedly surged by 389% from 1,600 in 2024 to 7,831 in 2025. The increased use of AI-powered tools has allowed attackers to scale their operations, further fueling the crisis.


Affected Organizations

The primary organizations affected by these bans are:

  • Public Sector: Government agencies at the national and local levels.
  • Critical National Infrastructure (CNI): Organizations in sectors such as energy, water, transportation, healthcare, and finance.
  • Small and Medium-sized Businesses (SMBs): While initial bans are focused on the public sector, the trend could expand to cover all organizations, putting pressure on SMBs who are frequent victims.

Compliance Requirements

Organizations under the jurisdiction of a ransom payment ban will be legally prohibited from transferring funds to a threat actor in response to a ransomware attack. Compliance will require a fundamental shift in incident response strategy, moving away from payment as a potential option.

Key obligations will include:

  1. Non-Payment: An absolute prohibition on paying ransoms, either directly or through intermediaries like insurance companies or incident response firms.
  2. Mandatory Reporting: A requirement to report all ransomware incidents to relevant government and law enforcement agencies.
  3. Enhanced Security Posture: An implicit requirement to invest heavily in preventative security controls and robust backup and recovery solutions, as payment is no longer a fallback.

Impact Assessment

The move to ban ransom payments has significant business and operational impacts:

  • Increased Pressure on Defense: With payment off the table, the onus is entirely on the organization's ability to prevent an attack or recover from it. This necessitates greater investment in cybersecurity defenses and resilient backup systems.
  • Difficult Recovery Scenarios: If an attacker successfully encrypts data and also destroys or encrypts backups, a payment ban could leave a victim with no way to recover their data, potentially leading to business failure.
  • Insurance Market Shift: The cyber insurance industry will need to adapt. Policies may shift focus from covering ransom payments to covering business interruption and recovery costs.
  • Risk of Underground Payments: A complete ban could drive payments underground, making it harder for law enforcement to track money flows to criminal groups.

Enforcement & Penalties

Non-compliance with a ransom payment ban would likely result in severe penalties, including substantial financial fines that could exceed the original ransom demand. Enforcement would be carried out by national cybersecurity agencies and financial regulators.


Compliance Guidance

Organizations, particularly those in critical sectors, should begin preparing for a future where ransom payments are illegal:

  1. Invest in Resilient Backups: The top priority is to implement and regularly test a 3-2-1 backup strategy with at least one immutable or air-gapped copy. Recovery capability is paramount.
  2. Develop a No-Pay Incident Response Plan: Update incident response plans to remove payment as an option. The plan should focus entirely on containment, eradication, and recovery from backups.
  3. Conduct Tabletop Exercises: Run regular tabletop exercises that simulate a ransomware attack where payment is not an option. This will test the organization's ability to recover and identify gaps in its strategy.
  4. Strengthen Preventative Controls: Double down on fundamental security hygiene: enforce MFA, maintain a rigorous patch management program, train users on phishing, and segment networks.

Timeline of Events

1
July 20, 2026
Reports highlight a growing trend of governments moving to ban ransomware payments.
2
July 20, 2026
This article was published

Timeline of Events

1
July 20, 2026

Reports highlight a growing trend of governments moving to ban ransomware payments.

Sources & References

Article Author

Jason Gomes

Jason Gomes

• Cybersecurity Practitioner

Cybersecurity professional with over 10 years of specialized experience in security operations, threat intelligence, incident response, and security automation. Expertise spans SOAR/XSOAR orchestration, threat intelligence platforms, SIEM/UEBA analytics, and building cyber fusion centers. Background includes technical enablement, solution architecture for enterprise and government clients, and implementing security automation workflows across IR, TIP, and SOC use cases.

Threat Intelligence & AnalysisSecurity Orchestration (SOAR/XSOAR)Incident Response & Digital ForensicsSecurity Operations Center (SOC)SIEM & Security AnalyticsCyber Fusion & Threat SharingSecurity Automation & IntegrationManaged Detection & Response (MDR)

Editorial Standards & Analyst Review

CyberNetSec.io uses automation to assist source monitoring, deduplication, observable extraction, and structured intelligence generation. Published analysis follows human-defined editorial standards and adds defensive context including MITRE ATT&CK, D3FEND, STIX, and Sigma where applicable. Read our editorial policy.

Tags

RansomwarePolicyRegulationCybercrimeGovernment

📢 Share This Article

Help others stay informed about cybersecurity threats

🎯 MITRE ATT&CK Mapped

Every tactic, technique, and sub-technique used in this threat has been identified and mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework for consistent, actionable threat language.

🧠 Enriched & Analyzed

Observables and indicators of compromise (IOCs) have been extracted and cataloged. Risk has been assessed and correlated with known threat actors and historical campaigns.

🛡️ Actionable Guidance

Detection rules, incident response steps, and D3FEND-aligned mitigation strategies are included so your team can act on this intelligence immediately.

🔗 STIX Visualizer

Structured threat data is packaged as a STIX 2.1 bundle and can be visualized as an interactive graph — relationships between actors, malware, techniques, and indicators.

Sigma Generator

Sigma detection rules are derived from the threat techniques in this article and can be converted for deployment across any major SIEM or EDR platform.