Gentlemen Ransomware Emerges with Aggressive EDR Evasion Tactics

New 'Gentlemen' Ransomware Uses EDR Killer Framework to Blindside Security Tools

HIGH
June 20, 2026
6m read
RansomwareMalwareThreat Actor

Impact Scope

Affected Companies

AmigestBurris & MacOmber, PLLCOFAQ

Industries Affected

Legal ServicesRetailOther

Related Entities

Threat Actors

The Gentlemen

Other

Gentlemen RansomwareGentleKiller EDR FrameworkAmigestBurris & MacOmber, PLLCOFAQ

Full Report

Executive Summary

A new Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) group calling itself The Gentlemen has been identified in the wild, employing an aggressive strategy focused on dismantling endpoint security controls. The group's ransomware variant is notable for deploying a suite of Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and antivirus (AV) termination tools, dubbed the GentleKiller EDR Framework, as a preliminary step before encryption. This tactic of using multiple EDR killers simultaneously aims to neutralize a broad spectrum of security products, thereby ensuring the ransomware payload can execute unimpeded. This approach represents a direct assault on enterprise defense mechanisms and underscores the importance of robust tamper protection and behavioral monitoring to counter such threats.

Threat Overview

The Gentlemen Ransomware operation distinguishes itself by prioritizing defense evasion. Instead of relying solely on obfuscation or fileless techniques, the threat actors actively attempt to terminate security processes and services. By deploying multiple EDR killer tools at once, they create a race condition against the security software and increase the probability that at least one of the tools will succeed in disabling defenses on the targeted endpoint.

This TTP is a direct implementation of T1562.001 - Disable or Modify Tools. Once the EDR/AV agent is disabled or killed, the ransomware proceeds with its primary objectives: discovering and encrypting files on local and network drives (T1486 - Data Encrypted for Impact). The group has already been linked to successful attacks against several organizations, including Amigest, Burris & MacOmber, PLL, and COFAQ, indicating its effectiveness.

Technical Analysis

The attack chain for The Gentlemen ransomware typically involves the following stages:

  1. Initial Access: (Not specified in articles, but common vectors include phishing, exploiting public-facing applications, or using initial access brokers).
  2. Defense Evasion: The core of their novel strategy. Upon execution, the initial payload launches the GentleKiller EDR Framework. This framework is not a single tool but a collection of known and custom scripts and binaries designed to target specific security products. It attempts to:
    • Stop security-related services.
    • Kill security agent processes.
    • Unload kernel drivers associated with EDR/AV products.
    • Modify registry keys to disable security features. This multi-tool approach is a brute-force method to overcome endpoint defenses.
  3. Impact: Once defenses are confirmed to be disabled, the ransomware payload is executed. It enumerates local drives, connected removable media, and accessible network shares to encrypt files. It then typically drops a ransom note on the desktop and in each encrypted directory.

The use of a multi-tool EDR-killing framework is a logical evolution of ransomware tactics. Instead of hoping to evade a specific product, attackers are now attempting to incapacitate the entire class of security software, making detection and response significantly more challenging.

Impact Assessment

The business impact of a successful attack by The Gentlemen ransomware is severe, compounded by its ability to disable security tools. The primary impact is the immediate operational disruption caused by the unavailability of critical data and systems. Because the EDR is disabled, incident responders may lack the necessary telemetry to investigate the breach, determine the root cause, and understand the full scope of the compromise. This blindness extends the recovery time and increases the cost of remediation. The reputational damage and potential for data exfiltration (double extortion) further amplify the financial and operational consequences.

IOCs — Directly from Articles

No specific file hashes, IP addresses, or domains were provided in the source articles.

Cyber Observables — Hunting Hints

Security teams may want to hunt for the following patterns which could indicate related activity:

Type
event_id
Value
7045 or 4697
Description
Windows Event ID for a new service installation. EDR killer tools may install malicious drivers or services.
Type
command_line_pattern
Value
sc stop <EDR_service_name>
Description
Command line attempts to stop known EDR/AV services (e.g., sc stop CsbAgent).
Type
command_line_pattern
Value
taskkill /IM <EDR_process_name>.exe /F
Description
Command line attempts to forcefully terminate EDR/AV processes.
Type
process_name
Value
PCHunter.sys, PROCEXP.sys
Description
Names of legitimate but frequently abused drivers used to terminate protected processes.
Type
log_source
Value
EDR/AV Tamper Protection Alerts
Description
The most direct indicator. Any alert indicating the security agent is being tampered with should be treated as a high-priority incident.

Detection & Response

Detection:

  • Tamper Protection: The most critical defense is enabling and hardening EDR/AV tamper protection features. Ensure that these settings are configured to their highest level and generate high-severity alerts upon any attempt to stop services, kill processes, or modify agent files.
  • Behavioral Monitoring: Use a security solution that focuses on behavioral detection rather than just static signatures. An alert should be generated when a process attempts to enumerate and terminate multiple security tools. This is a key capability of Behavior Prevention on Endpoint (M1040).
  • Log Auditing: Monitor Windows Event Logs for service stop/delete events (Event ID 7034, 7045) and process termination events related to your security products. D3FEND's Process Analysis (D3-PA) is a relevant defensive technique.

Response:

  1. If a tamper alert is received, immediately isolate the affected host from the network to prevent the ransomware from spreading.
  2. If possible, trigger a memory dump of the machine to capture the EDR killer tools and the ransomware payload for analysis.
  3. Assume that other machines may be compromised and begin a broader threat hunt for similar activity.
  4. Engage incident response and ransomware recovery specialists.

Mitigation

Immediate Actions:

  • Review Tamper Protection: Immediately audit all EDR/AV agent configurations to ensure tamper protection is enabled and set to its most restrictive level. Test that it effectively prevents service stops and process kills.
  • Principle of Least Privilege: Ensure that standard user accounts do not have administrative privileges. Many EDR killer tools require elevated permissions to function effectively. This aligns with M1026 - Privileged Account Management.

Strategic Improvements:

  • Application Control: Implement application control policies, such as AppLocker or WDAC, to restrict the execution of unauthorized binaries. This can prevent the EDR killer tools from running in the first place. This is a form of M1038 - Execution Prevention.
  • Defense in Depth: Do not rely solely on EDR. Layer defenses with network segmentation, regular backups (stored offline and immutable), and user training to create a more resilient security posture.
  • Backup and Recovery: Maintain and regularly test offline and immutable backups. This is the ultimate safety net against a successful ransomware attack.

Timeline of Events

1
June 20, 2026
This article was published

MITRE ATT&CK Mitigations

Utilize EDR/AV solutions with strong, enabled tamper protection and behavioral detection rules to identify and block attempts to disable security tools.

Mapped D3FEND Techniques:

Use application control solutions to prevent the execution of unauthorized EDR-killer tools.

Mapped D3FEND Techniques:

Restrict administrative privileges to limit the ability of malware to disable system-level security services.

Mapped D3FEND Techniques:

D3FEND Defensive Countermeasures

Configure EDR and security monitoring tools to specifically analyze and alert on processes that attempt to interact with security agents. This involves creating detection rules that trigger when a non-security process attempts to query, stop, or modify the services or processes of your installed EDR/AV (e.g., SentinelOne, CrowdStrike, etc.). For example, a rule could alert if cmd.exe or powershell.exe spawns a child process like sc.exe stop <EDR_service> or taskkill /f /im <EDR_process>. This behavioral approach is crucial for detecting the Gentlemen ransomware's 'GentleKiller' framework, as it focuses on the malicious action (disabling defenses) rather than a specific file signature. Baselining normal system behavior is key to reducing false positives and ensuring these high-fidelity alerts are investigated immediately.

The most direct application of this technique against the Gentlemen ransomware is to maximize the tamper protection capabilities of your existing EDR/AV solutions. This is a form of hardening the security application itself. Ensure that tamper protection is not only enabled but configured to its most stringent setting, which typically requires a password or token to make any administrative changes to the agent. This should prevent unauthorized attempts to stop services, kill processes, or unload drivers. Regularly audit these settings across your entire fleet of endpoints to ensure there is no configuration drift. Test these controls by attempting to manually disable an agent to verify that the protection is working as expected and generating the appropriate alerts.

Implement a strict application allowlisting policy on critical servers and workstations using tools like Windows Defender Application Control (WDAC) or AppLocker. By defining a set of known, trusted executables that are permitted to run, you can prevent the 'GentleKiller' framework's tools from executing in the first place. This proactive defense does not rely on detecting malicious behavior but on preventing unknown code from running at all. While challenging to deploy enterprise-wide, starting with high-value assets like domain controllers, database servers, and executive workstations can provide a powerful layer of defense against ransomware variants like The Gentlemen, which rely on dropping and executing external tools to achieve their objectives.

Sources & References

Cybersecurity News
WIU Cybersecurity CenterJune 19, 2026
Recent Data Breaches in 2026
BreachSenseJune 19, 2026

Article Author

Jason Gomes

Jason Gomes

• Cybersecurity Practitioner

Cybersecurity professional with over 10 years of specialized experience in security operations, threat intelligence, incident response, and security automation. Expertise spans SOAR/XSOAR orchestration, threat intelligence platforms, SIEM/UEBA analytics, and building cyber fusion centers. Background includes technical enablement, solution architecture for enterprise and government clients, and implementing security automation workflows across IR, TIP, and SOC use cases.

Threat Intelligence & AnalysisSecurity Orchestration (SOAR/XSOAR)Incident Response & Digital ForensicsSecurity Operations Center (SOC)SIEM & Security AnalyticsCyber Fusion & Threat SharingSecurity Automation & IntegrationManaged Detection & Response (MDR)

Tags

Gentlemen RansomwareRaaSEDR EvasionDefense EvasionTamper ProtectionMalware

📢 Share This Article

Help others stay informed about cybersecurity threats

🎯 MITRE ATT&CK Mapped

Every tactic, technique, and sub-technique used in this threat has been identified and mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework for consistent, actionable threat language.

🧠 Enriched & Analyzed

Observables and indicators of compromise (IOCs) have been extracted and cataloged. Risk has been assessed and correlated with known threat actors and historical campaigns.

🛡️ Actionable Guidance

Detection rules, incident response steps, and D3FEND-aligned mitigation strategies are included so your team can act on this intelligence immediately.

🔗 STIX Visualizer

Structured threat data is packaged as a STIX 2.1 bundle and can be visualized as an interactive graph — relationships between actors, malware, techniques, and indicators.

Sigma Generator

Sigma detection rules are derived from the threat techniques in this article and can be converted for deployment across any major SIEM or EDR platform.