A new Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) group calling itself The Gentlemen has been identified in the wild, employing an aggressive strategy focused on dismantling endpoint security controls. The group's ransomware variant is notable for deploying a suite of Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and antivirus (AV) termination tools, dubbed the GentleKiller EDR Framework, as a preliminary step before encryption. This tactic of using multiple EDR killers simultaneously aims to neutralize a broad spectrum of security products, thereby ensuring the ransomware payload can execute unimpeded. This approach represents a direct assault on enterprise defense mechanisms and underscores the importance of robust tamper protection and behavioral monitoring to counter such threats.
The Gentlemen Ransomware operation distinguishes itself by prioritizing defense evasion. Instead of relying solely on obfuscation or fileless techniques, the threat actors actively attempt to terminate security processes and services. By deploying multiple EDR killer tools at once, they create a race condition against the security software and increase the probability that at least one of the tools will succeed in disabling defenses on the targeted endpoint.
This TTP is a direct implementation of T1562.001 - Disable or Modify Tools. Once the EDR/AV agent is disabled or killed, the ransomware proceeds with its primary objectives: discovering and encrypting files on local and network drives (T1486 - Data Encrypted for Impact). The group has already been linked to successful attacks against several organizations, including Amigest, Burris & MacOmber, PLL, and COFAQ, indicating its effectiveness.
The attack chain for The Gentlemen ransomware typically involves the following stages:
The use of a multi-tool EDR-killing framework is a logical evolution of ransomware tactics. Instead of hoping to evade a specific product, attackers are now attempting to incapacitate the entire class of security software, making detection and response significantly more challenging.
The business impact of a successful attack by The Gentlemen ransomware is severe, compounded by its ability to disable security tools. The primary impact is the immediate operational disruption caused by the unavailability of critical data and systems. Because the EDR is disabled, incident responders may lack the necessary telemetry to investigate the breach, determine the root cause, and understand the full scope of the compromise. This blindness extends the recovery time and increases the cost of remediation. The reputational damage and potential for data exfiltration (double extortion) further amplify the financial and operational consequences.
No specific file hashes, IP addresses, or domains were provided in the source articles.
Security teams may want to hunt for the following patterns which could indicate related activity:
event_id7045 or 4697command_line_patternsc stop <EDR_service_name>sc stop CsbAgent).command_line_patterntaskkill /IM <EDR_process_name>.exe /Fprocess_namePCHunter.sys, PROCEXP.syslog_sourceEDR/AV Tamper Protection AlertsDetection:
Event ID 7034, 7045) and process termination events related to your security products. D3FEND's Process Analysis (D3-PA) is a relevant defensive technique.Response:
Immediate Actions:
Strategic Improvements:
Utilize EDR/AV solutions with strong, enabled tamper protection and behavioral detection rules to identify and block attempts to disable security tools.
Mapped D3FEND Techniques:
Use application control solutions to prevent the execution of unauthorized EDR-killer tools.
Mapped D3FEND Techniques:
Restrict administrative privileges to limit the ability of malware to disable system-level security services.
Mapped D3FEND Techniques:
Configure EDR and security monitoring tools to specifically analyze and alert on processes that attempt to interact with security agents. This involves creating detection rules that trigger when a non-security process attempts to query, stop, or modify the services or processes of your installed EDR/AV (e.g., SentinelOne, CrowdStrike, etc.). For example, a rule could alert if cmd.exe or powershell.exe spawns a child process like sc.exe stop <EDR_service> or taskkill /f /im <EDR_process>. This behavioral approach is crucial for detecting the Gentlemen ransomware's 'GentleKiller' framework, as it focuses on the malicious action (disabling defenses) rather than a specific file signature. Baselining normal system behavior is key to reducing false positives and ensuring these high-fidelity alerts are investigated immediately.
The most direct application of this technique against the Gentlemen ransomware is to maximize the tamper protection capabilities of your existing EDR/AV solutions. This is a form of hardening the security application itself. Ensure that tamper protection is not only enabled but configured to its most stringent setting, which typically requires a password or token to make any administrative changes to the agent. This should prevent unauthorized attempts to stop services, kill processes, or unload drivers. Regularly audit these settings across your entire fleet of endpoints to ensure there is no configuration drift. Test these controls by attempting to manually disable an agent to verify that the protection is working as expected and generating the appropriate alerts.
Implement a strict application allowlisting policy on critical servers and workstations using tools like Windows Defender Application Control (WDAC) or AppLocker. By defining a set of known, trusted executables that are permitted to run, you can prevent the 'GentleKiller' framework's tools from executing in the first place. This proactive defense does not rely on detecting malicious behavior but on preventing unknown code from running at all. While challenging to deploy enterprise-wide, starting with high-value assets like domain controllers, database servers, and executive workstations can provide a powerful layer of defense against ransomware variants like The Gentlemen, which rely on dropping and executing external tools to achieve their objectives.

Cybersecurity professional with over 10 years of specialized experience in security operations, threat intelligence, incident response, and security automation. Expertise spans SOAR/XSOAR orchestration, threat intelligence platforms, SIEM/UEBA analytics, and building cyber fusion centers. Background includes technical enablement, solution architecture for enterprise and government clients, and implementing security automation workflows across IR, TIP, and SOC use cases.
Help others stay informed about cybersecurity threats
Every tactic, technique, and sub-technique used in this threat has been identified and mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework for consistent, actionable threat language.
Observables and indicators of compromise (IOCs) have been extracted and cataloged. Risk has been assessed and correlated with known threat actors and historical campaigns.
Detection rules, incident response steps, and D3FEND-aligned mitigation strategies are included so your team can act on this intelligence immediately.
Structured threat data is packaged as a STIX 2.1 bundle and can be visualized as an interactive graph — relationships between actors, malware, techniques, and indicators.
Sigma detection rules are derived from the threat techniques in this article and can be converted for deployment across any major SIEM or EDR platform.