A new Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) group calling itself The Gentlemen has been identified in the wild, employing an aggressive strategy focused on dismantling endpoint security controls. The group's ransomware variant is notable for deploying a suite of Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and antivirus (AV) termination tools, dubbed the GentleKiller EDR Framework, as a preliminary step before encryption. This tactic of using multiple EDR killers simultaneously aims to neutralize a broad spectrum of security products, thereby ensuring the ransomware payload can execute unimpeded. This approach represents a direct assault on enterprise defense mechanisms and underscores the importance of robust tamper protection and behavioral monitoring to counter such threats.
The Gentlemen Ransomware operation distinguishes itself by prioritizing defense evasion. Instead of relying solely on obfuscation or fileless techniques, the threat actors actively attempt to terminate security processes and services. By deploying multiple EDR killer tools at once, they create a race condition against the security software and increase the probability that at least one of the tools will succeed in disabling defenses on the targeted endpoint.
This TTP is a direct implementation of T1562.001 - Disable or Modify Tools. Once the EDR/AV agent is disabled or killed, the ransomware proceeds with its primary objectives: discovering and encrypting files on local and network drives (T1486 - Data Encrypted for Impact). The group has already been linked to successful attacks against several organizations, including Amigest, Burris & MacOmber, PLL, and COFAQ, indicating its effectiveness.
The attack chain for The Gentlemen ransomware typically involves the following stages:
The use of a multi-tool EDR-killing framework is a logical evolution of ransomware tactics. Instead of hoping to evade a specific product, attackers are now attempting to incapacitate the entire class of security software, making detection and response significantly more challenging.
The business impact of a successful attack by The Gentlemen ransomware is severe, compounded by its ability to disable security tools. The primary impact is the immediate operational disruption caused by the unavailability of critical data and systems. Because the EDR is disabled, incident responders may lack the necessary telemetry to investigate the breach, determine the root cause, and understand the full scope of the compromise. This blindness extends the recovery time and increases the cost of remediation. The reputational damage and potential for data exfiltration (double extortion) further amplify the financial and operational consequences.
No specific file hashes, IP addresses, or domains were provided in the source articles.
Security teams may want to hunt for the following patterns which could indicate related activity:
event_id7045 or 4697command_line_patternsc stop <EDR_service_name>sc stop CsbAgent).command_line_patterntaskkill /IM <EDR_process_name>.exe /Fprocess_namePCHunter.sys, PROCEXP.syslog_sourceEDR/AV Tamper Protection AlertsDetection:
Event ID 7034, 7045) and process termination events related to your security products. D3FEND's Process Analysis (D3-PA) is a relevant defensive technique.Response:
Immediate Actions:
Strategic Improvements:
ESET details 'GentleKiller,' The Gentlemen ransomware's custom EDR-killing framework. It targets over 400 processes from 48 vendors, utilizing kernel-level termination.
New analysis by ESET researchers reveals the specific EDR-killing framework used by The Gentlemen ransomware is named 'GentleKiller.' This custom toolkit is highly sophisticated, designed to neutralize over 400 processes from 48 different security vendors, including major players like Microsoft Defender, CrowdStrike, and Sophos. Crucially, GentleKiller operates by terminating security processes at the kernel level, a significantly more robust and effective method than user-space process killers. This kernel-level operation, likely involving a maliciously loaded driver (BYOVD), allows it to bypass the self-protection mechanisms of modern EDR solutions, making it much harder to detect and prevent the subsequent ransomware deployment. This development highlights a significant escalation in the technical capabilities of RaaS operations.

Cybersecurity professional with over 10 years of specialized experience in security operations, threat intelligence, incident response, and security automation. Expertise spans SOAR/XSOAR orchestration, threat intelligence platforms, SIEM/UEBA analytics, and building cyber fusion centers. Background includes technical enablement, solution architecture for enterprise and government clients, and implementing security automation workflows across IR, TIP, and SOC use cases.
CyberNetSec.io uses automation to assist source monitoring, deduplication, observable extraction, and structured intelligence generation. Published analysis follows human-defined editorial standards and adds defensive context including MITRE ATT&CK, D3FEND, STIX, and Sigma where applicable. Read our editorial policy.
Help others stay informed about cybersecurity threats
Every tactic, technique, and sub-technique used in this threat has been identified and mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework for consistent, actionable threat language.
Observables and indicators of compromise (IOCs) have been extracted and cataloged. Risk has been assessed and correlated with known threat actors and historical campaigns.
Detection rules, incident response steps, and D3FEND-aligned mitigation strategies are included so your team can act on this intelligence immediately.
Structured threat data is packaged as a STIX 2.1 bundle and can be visualized as an interactive graph — relationships between actors, malware, techniques, and indicators.
Sigma detection rules are derived from the threat techniques in this article and can be converted for deployment across any major SIEM or EDR platform.