The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and the National Security Agency (NSA) have issued a joint advisory warning operators of Automatic Tank Gauge (ATG) systems about ongoing, targeted cyberattacks. Unattributed threat actors are compromising internet-exposed ATG devices, which are critical for monitoring fuel and other liquids in several key infrastructure sectors. The attackers have demonstrated the ability to disable safety alerts, potentially leading to undetected fuel leaks or other hazardous situations. The agencies are urging immediate defensive actions, including removing ATG systems from public-facing networks, strengthening password security, and implementing multi-factor authentication.
Automatic Tank Gauge (ATG) systems are essential components in the operational technology (OT) networks of the energy, chemical, food and agriculture, and transportation sectors. They provide remote monitoring of fuel levels, temperature, and leak detection in storage tanks. According to the joint advisory, threat actors are actively scanning the internet for and compromising vulnerable ATG systems.
The primary attack vector is the direct exposure of ATG serial ports and web interfaces to the internet. Attackers are exploiting this exposure to gain unauthorized access and execute remote commands. A key malicious action observed is the disabling of system alerts. This manipulation could prevent operators from being notified of critical physical events, such as fuel spills or overfills, creating significant environmental and safety hazards. While the U.S. government has not made a formal attribution, previous investigations into similar attacks have suggested a potential link to Iranian state-sponsored actors.
The attacks leverage fundamental security weaknesses, primarily the exposure of OT systems to the internet. Threat actors are exploiting default or weak credentials to access ATG web interfaces and command functions.
8001, 9001, and 10001.T0886 - Remote Services: Attackers are accessing and manipulating ATG systems through their exposed remote interfaces.T1078 - Valid Accounts: The compromise likely involves the use of default or easily guessable passwords to gain access.T1212 - Exploitation of Remote Services: Gaining access to manipulate system functions, such as disabling alerts.T0829 - Impair Process Control: By disabling alerts, attackers directly impair the process control function of the ATG system, which could lead to loss of safety.The potential impact of these attacks is severe. By disabling safety alerts, attackers can create a disconnect between the physical state of the fuel tank and the operator's monitoring system. This can lead to:
No specific Indicators of Compromise (IOCs) such as IP addresses, domains, or file hashes were provided in the source articles.
The following patterns could indicate related activity or vulnerable systems:
80019001100018001, 9001, 10001 from unknown external IP addresses.Security teams should proactively hunt for and secure ATG systems.
8001, 9001, and 10001.CISA and the NSA recommend immediate action to harden ATG systems.
Isolating ATG systems from the public internet and corporate IT networks is the most effective way to prevent unauthorized access.
Enforcing strong, unique passwords and changing default credentials prevents easy access by attackers.
Requiring MFA for all access to ATG management interfaces adds a critical layer of security against credential theft.
Applying the latest security patches from manufacturers closes known vulnerabilities that could be exploited.
Immediately remove any direct internet connections to Automatic Tank Gauge (ATG) systems. These OT devices should never be directly accessible from the public internet. Place them behind a firewall and segment them from the corporate IT network. Access should be strictly controlled through a secure method, such as a jump host within a demilitarized zone (DMZ) that requires multi-factor authentication. This action directly addresses the root cause of the current threat by eliminating the public attack surface and is the single most effective mitigation.
Audit all ATG systems and connected management interfaces for default credentials and immediately change them to strong, unique passwords. Implement a password policy that mandates complexity, regular rotation, and prohibits reuse across systems. Since many OT devices have hardcoded or easily discovered default passwords, this is a critical step to prevent low-effort compromises. This policy should be enforced for all accounts, including service and administrative accounts.
Where supported by the ATG system or its management platform, enable phishing-resistant multi-factor authentication for all users. This is especially critical for remote access solutions (like VPNs) that provide a path to the OT network. Implementing MFA provides a crucial defense layer, ensuring that even if an attacker compromises a user's password, they cannot gain access to the critical system without the second factor.

Cybersecurity professional with over 10 years of specialized experience in security operations, threat intelligence, incident response, and security automation. Expertise spans SOAR/XSOAR orchestration, threat intelligence platforms, SIEM/UEBA analytics, and building cyber fusion centers. Background includes technical enablement, solution architecture for enterprise and government clients, and implementing security automation workflows across IR, TIP, and SOC use cases.
Help others stay informed about cybersecurity threats
Every tactic, technique, and sub-technique used in this threat has been identified and mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework for consistent, actionable threat language.
Observables and indicators of compromise (IOCs) have been extracted and cataloged. Risk has been assessed and correlated with known threat actors and historical campaigns.
Detection rules, incident response steps, and D3FEND-aligned mitigation strategies are included so your team can act on this intelligence immediately.
Structured threat data is packaged as a STIX 2.1 bundle and can be visualized as an interactive graph — relationships between actors, malware, techniques, and indicators.
Sigma detection rules are derived from the threat techniques in this article and can be converted for deployment across any major SIEM or EDR platform.