On July 28, 2026, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), along with its international partners—the Australian Cyber Security Centre (ACSC), the UK's National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-UK), and the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (CCCS)—published joint guidance for Critical Infrastructure (CI) operators. The guidance, titled “CI Fortify – Advice for Isolating Vital Systems,” provides a strategic framework for organizations to plan, prepare for, and execute the isolation of their vital Operational Technology (OT) systems from corporate Information Technology (IT) networks. This initiative is a direct response to the escalating threat of disruptive cyberattacks from both nation-state actors and cybercriminals targeting essential services. The guidance strongly recommends physical separation as the most robust defense and provides a model for maintaining critical functions even when under attack.
The CI Fortify guidance is not a legally binding regulation but rather a set of strong recommendations and best practices. It provides a structured approach for CI operators to enhance their resilience against high-impact cyber events.
The core components of the framework include:
This guidance is aimed at owners and operators of critical infrastructure across all sectors, with a particular focus on those that rely heavily on OT and Industrial Control Systems (ICS). This includes, but is not limited to:
While not a mandate, the guidance outlines specific technical and procedural controls that organizations should implement:
There is no formal deadline for implementation. However, CISA and its partners are urging CI operators to begin adopting these principles immediately due to the current threat landscape. The guidance is intended to be a foundational document for long-term strategic planning and investment in OT security and resilience.
For many CI organizations, implementing this guidance will require significant strategic, operational, and financial investment.
Update clarifies 'CI Fortify' guidance is from Five Eyes nations, explicitly including New Zealand, and emphasizes its likely adoption as a de facto regulatory standard.
The updated information clarifies that the 'CI Fortify' guidance was issued by the Five Eyes intelligence alliance, explicitly naming New Zealand as a participating nation alongside the U.S., U.K., Australia, and Canada. The new report also places a stronger emphasis on the guidance's regulatory impact, stating it will likely serve as a de facto standard and be incorporated into sector-specific requirements, indicating a higher expectation for adherence. Additionally, new compliance advice such as 'Assume Breach' and 'Use the Purdue Model' are introduced.
Five Eyes nations, including New Zealand, officially endorse 'CI Fortify' guide, highlighting its de facto standard status.
The 'CI Fortify' guidance has been officially endorsed by the Five Eyes intelligence alliance, explicitly including New Zealand alongside the U.S., U.K., Australia, and Canada. This joint backing elevates the guide's status, positioning it as a de facto standard for critical infrastructure operators globally. Regulators are expected to integrate its principles into sector-specific requirements, driven by escalating threats like recent attacks on Minnesota water utilities. The update reinforces the urgency for CI operators to adopt these resilience measures.
CISA and international partners publish the "CI Fortify – Advice for Isolating Vital Systems" guidance.

Cybersecurity professional with over 10 years of specialized experience in security operations, threat intelligence, incident response, and security automation. Expertise spans SOAR/XSOAR orchestration, threat intelligence platforms, SIEM/UEBA analytics, and building cyber fusion centers. Background includes technical enablement, solution architecture for enterprise and government clients, and implementing security automation workflows across IR, TIP, and SOC use cases.
CyberNetSec.io uses automation to assist source monitoring, deduplication, observable extraction, and structured intelligence generation. Published analysis follows human-defined editorial standards and adds defensive context including MITRE ATT&CK, D3FEND, STIX, and Sigma where applicable. Read our editorial policy.
Help others stay informed about cybersecurity threats
Every tactic, technique, and sub-technique used in this threat has been identified and mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework for consistent, actionable threat language.
Observables and indicators of compromise (IOCs) have been extracted and cataloged. Risk has been assessed and correlated with known threat actors and historical campaigns.
Detection rules, incident response steps, and D3FEND-aligned mitigation strategies are included so your team can act on this intelligence immediately.
Structured threat data is packaged as a STIX 2.1 bundle and can be visualized as an interactive graph — relationships between actors, malware, techniques, and indicators.
Sigma detection rules are derived from the threat techniques in this article and can be converted for deployment across any major SIEM or EDR platform.