Security researchers at Huntress have uncovered an ongoing phishing campaign that impersonates Bank of America to deploy a persistent Remote Access Trojan (RAT). The attack, first observed on July 28, 2026, uses a classic social engineering lure to trick victims into downloading a malicious installer. The installer deploys a legitimate version of the ConnectWise ScreenConnect remote management tool, disguised as a 'Windows Security' service. A key component of the attack is a VBScript payload that modifies the service's security descriptors, effectively cloaking it from view and preventing its removal, a form of User Account Control (UAC) bypass. This provides the attacker with stealthy and persistent remote access to the compromised Windows machine, which then connects to a command-and-control (C2) server in the United Arab Emirates.
The attack begins with a phishing email sent from a spoofed address designed to look like it originates from Bank of America. The email contains a warning that the user's account will be restricted unless they confirm their details by clicking a link.
The attack chain proceeds as follows:
T1036.005 - Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location).T1548.002 - Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism: Bypass User Account Control). The service itself provides persistence.8041/tcp, giving the attacker full remote control (T1219 - Remote Access Software).The most notable technique in this campaign is the abuse of SDDL to hide the malicious service. By manipulating the service's Access Control List (ACL), the attacker makes it invisible to tools like the Services control panel (services.msc) and even command-line tools like sc.exe when queried by a standard administrator. This is a sophisticated defense evasion technique designed to maintain long-term, undetected access.
The use of a legitimate, signed RMM tool like ScreenConnect is a common tactic to bypass antivirus and EDR solutions that rely on signature-based detection. The tool's traffic is often allowed through firewalls, and its presence on a system may not immediately trigger an alert.
The VBScript payload is responsible for the defense evasion and persistence. It first cleans up by deleting the registry key of the initial installer, then applies the restrictive SDDL string to the 'Windows Security' service. This multi-step process, combining social engineering, masquerading, and advanced permission manipulation, demonstrates a well-crafted attack designed for stealth.
The primary impact is the complete compromise of the victim's computer. With full remote access, the attacker can perform a wide range of malicious actions, including:
Huntress published IOCs, but they were not included in the summary articles. The key observable is the C2 infrastructure.
sc.exe sdset to modify service permissions with complex SDDL strings.8041/tcp, particularly to IP addresses located in the UAE or other unusual geolocations.sc.exe sdset).8041. All outbound traffic should be restricted to known and necessary ports and destinations.Training users to recognize and report phishing emails is the first line of defense against this type of attack.
Use application control to prevent the execution of unauthorized remote access software like ScreenConnect, or to restrict the execution of VBScript files.
Mapped D3FEND Techniques:
Enable and monitor logs related to service creation and modification to detect attempts to install and hide malicious services.
Mapped D3FEND Techniques:
Block outbound network traffic on non-standard ports like 8041 to prevent the RAT from connecting to its C2 server.
Mapped D3FEND Techniques:
To detect the core of this attack's defense evasion, security teams should implement controls that monitor and restrict service modifications. Specifically, create EDR or Sysmon rules to alert on any process using sc.exe with the sdset argument. This command is used to directly modify a service's security descriptor and is rarely used in legitimate administrative activity. An alert on sc.exe sdset provides a high-fidelity indicator of an attacker attempting to hide a service, as seen in this campaign. This allows security teams to investigate and terminate the malicious service before the attacker can establish long-term control.
The attackers are abusing a legitimate RMM tool, ScreenConnect. Organizations should maintain a strict policy on allowed software. Use application control technologies like AppLocker or EDR-based denylisting to block the execution of all RMM tools that are not part of the corporate standard. If ScreenConnect is not an approved tool, adding its executable hashes and names to a denylist will prevent the payload from running, even if the user is tricked into downloading it. This breaks the attack chain immediately after the initial phishing link is clicked.
The ScreenConnect RAT needs to connect to its C2 server on TCP port 8041 to receive commands. Implementing a default-deny policy for outbound network traffic on endpoints is a powerful compensating control. Configure endpoint firewalls to block all outbound traffic except for that on standard, approved ports (e.g., 80, 443) to approved destinations. Blocking traffic on port 8041 would sever the C2 connection, rendering the RAT useless. Monitoring for and alerting on blocked outbound connection attempts on non-standard ports can also serve as an indicator of a successful initial compromise.
Huntress researchers detect the phishing campaign in a spam trap.

Cybersecurity professional with over 10 years of specialized experience in security operations, threat intelligence, incident response, and security automation. Expertise spans SOAR/XSOAR orchestration, threat intelligence platforms, SIEM/UEBA analytics, and building cyber fusion centers. Background includes technical enablement, solution architecture for enterprise and government clients, and implementing security automation workflows across IR, TIP, and SOC use cases.
CyberNetSec.io uses automation to assist source monitoring, deduplication, observable extraction, and structured intelligence generation. Published analysis follows human-defined editorial standards and adds defensive context including MITRE ATT&CK, D3FEND, STIX, and Sigma where applicable. Read our editorial policy.
Every tactic, technique, and sub-technique used in this threat has been identified and mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework for consistent, actionable threat language.
Observables and indicators of compromise (IOCs) have been extracted and cataloged. Risk has been assessed and correlated with known threat actors and historical campaigns.
Detection rules, incident response steps, and D3FEND-aligned mitigation strategies are included so your team can act on this intelligence immediately.
Structured threat data is packaged as a STIX 2.1 bundle and can be visualized as an interactive graph — relationships between actors, malware, techniques, and indicators.
Sigma detection rules are derived from the threat techniques in this article and can be converted for deployment across any major SIEM or EDR platform.