Cyber-Fraud Now Top Global Threat, Surpassing Ransomware, WEF Report Finds

WEF Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2026: Cyber-Fraud and AI-Driven Threats Redefine Risk Landscape

INFORMATIONAL
January 12, 2026
5m read
Policy and ComplianceThreat IntelligenceRegulatory

Related Entities

Full Report

Executive Summary

The World Economic Forum (WEF), in collaboration with Accenture, has released its 'Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2026' report, indicating a fundamental shift in the primary concerns of global business and security leaders. For the first time, cyber-enabled fraud and phishing have overtaken ransomware as the most pressing cyber threat. The report, released on January 12, 2026, states that fraud is causing massive financial losses and eroding trust in the digital economy. A staggering 73% of leaders reported that they or a peer had been personally affected by cyber-fraud in 2025. The second major theme is the transformative impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI). While AI offers powerful new defensive tools, leaders are increasingly concerned about its use in creating more sophisticated attacks and the potential for data leakage through generative AI platforms. Geopolitical fragmentation is cited as a key factor exacerbating these risks.

Regulatory Details

The WEF report is not a regulatory document but a high-level analysis of global trends designed to inform policymakers, C-suite executives, and security professionals. It synthesizes survey data from global leaders to provide a strategic outlook. Key findings and their implications include:

  • Shift in Threat Perception: The elevation of fraud over ransomware suggests that the high-volume, lower-sophistication attacks are now causing more cumulative damage than the high-impact, lower-frequency ransomware events. This may influence where organizations and governments allocate security resources.
  • AI as a Force Multiplier: The report frames AI as the single biggest agent of change in cybersecurity for 2026. This will likely spur regulatory interest in AI governance, secure AI development practices (AI-SDLC), and rules around the use of generative AI in corporate environments.
  • Geopolitical Risk: Declining confidence in national cyber defense capabilities, particularly for critical infrastructure, is a major concern. The report suggests that geopolitical tensions are leading to more fragmented and less cooperative international cybersecurity efforts.

Affected Organizations

The report's findings are relevant to virtually all organizations across every sector and geography. Specific callouts include:

  • All Businesses: The rise of cyber-fraud affects every organization that conducts online transactions or communicates digitally.
  • Financial Services, Retail, and Manufacturing: These sectors are highlighted as being particularly impacted by fraud and supply chain risks.
  • Individuals: The report notes high rates of digital scams affecting individuals, with 73% of business leaders personally experiencing or knowing a peer who experienced fraud.
  • Governments and Regulators: The findings serve as a call to action for governments to update national cybersecurity strategies to address the scale of fraud and the challenges of AI.

Impact Assessment

  • Economic Impact: The 'record highs' in cyber-fraud translate to direct financial losses for businesses and consumers, increased insurance premiums, and higher operational costs for fraud detection and prevention.
  • Erosion of Trust: The pervasiveness of fraud and phishing undermines consumer and business trust in the digital ecosystem, which can slow digital transformation and economic growth.
  • Strategic Shift in Security: Security teams may need to rebalance their focus and budgets. While ransomware defense remains critical, resources may need to be shifted towards stronger identity and access management (IAM), anti-phishing controls, and user awareness training to combat fraud at scale.
  • AI Arms Race: The report signals an escalating arms race where attackers use AI to create deepfake social engineering attacks and polymorphic malware, while defenders use AI for advanced threat detection and automated response. Organizations that fail to adopt AI-powered defenses may be left behind.

Compliance Guidance

Based on the report's themes, organizations should prioritize the following:

  1. Strengthen Anti-Fraud Controls: Implement robust, multi-layered anti-fraud technologies. This includes advanced email security gateways, DMARC/DKIM/SPF for email authentication, and strong identity verification for customer-facing transactions. This aligns with M1017 - User Training and M1032 - Multi-factor Authentication.
  2. Develop an AI Governance Policy: Create a formal policy for the acceptable use of AI, particularly generative AI. This policy should address data privacy, intellectual property protection, and the risk of 'prompt injection' attacks. This is a form of D3FEND's Application Configuration Hardening (D3-ACH).
  3. Invest in AI-Powered Defense: Begin integrating AI and machine learning into the security stack for behavior-based threat detection, which is more effective against novel and AI-generated attacks than signature-based methods. This relates to D3FEND's User Behavior Analysis.
  4. Enhance Public-Private Partnerships: Engage with industry information sharing and analysis centers (ISACs) and government agencies to share threat intelligence on fraud campaigns and emerging AI-driven attack techniques.

Timeline of Events

1
January 12, 2026
The World Economic Forum releases its 'Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2026' report.
2
January 12, 2026
This article was published

MITRE ATT&CK Mitigations

Continuous user training and awareness programs are essential to build resilience against phishing and fraud.

Enforcing MFA is a critical technical control to prevent account takeovers that often lead to fraud.

Mapped D3FEND Techniques:

Implementing secure configurations for email (DMARC) and developing governance policies for AI are key mitigations.

Mapped D3FEND Techniques:

D3FEND Defensive Countermeasures

To combat the rise of sophisticated, AI-driven phishing and fraud, organizations must move beyond static rules and signatures and embrace User Behavior Analysis (UBA). UBA solutions create a baseline of normal activity for each user—what applications they use, what data they access, when and where they log in from. When an account is compromised, the attacker's behavior will almost certainly deviate from this baseline. A UBA system can detect and flag anomalies such as a user suddenly accessing sensitive financial data they've never touched before, logging in from a new country, or attempting to create a new email forwarding rule. This allows security teams to detect account takeovers in near real-time, even if the initial phish was successful, and quickly move to contain the threat before significant financial fraud can occur.

In the context of the WEF report, Application Configuration Hardening should focus on two key areas: email security and AI governance. For email, organizations must fully implement and enforce DMARC, DKIM, and SPF. A DMARC policy of p=reject is one of the most effective technical controls to prevent email domain spoofing, a cornerstone of many phishing and BEC fraud attacks. For AI, organizations must develop and enforce a clear policy on the use of generative AI tools. This should include rules preventing employees from submitting sensitive corporate data or PII into public AI models. For internal AI use, deploy private instances or use enterprise-grade solutions with strong data protection guarantees. This hardening approach reduces the attack surface for both inbound fraud and outbound data leakage.

Sources & References

World Economic Forum: Cyber-fraud overtakes ransomware
Infosecurity Magazine (infosecurity-magazine.com) January 12, 2026
Cyber fraud and geopolitics redefine cybersecurity risks worldwide, says WEF
Fortune India (fortuneindia.com) January 12, 2026

Article Author

Jason Gomes

Jason Gomes

• Cybersecurity Practitioner

Cybersecurity professional with over 10 years of specialized experience in security operations, threat intelligence, incident response, and security automation. Expertise spans SOAR/XSOAR orchestration, threat intelligence platforms, SIEM/UEBA analytics, and building cyber fusion centers. Background includes technical enablement, solution architecture for enterprise and government clients, and implementing security automation workflows across IR, TIP, and SOC use cases.

Threat Intelligence & AnalysisSecurity Orchestration (SOAR/XSOAR)Incident Response & Digital ForensicsSecurity Operations Center (SOC)SIEM & Security AnalyticsCyber Fusion & Threat SharingSecurity Automation & IntegrationManaged Detection & Response (MDR)

Tags

WEFCyber FraudPhishingRansomwareAIArtificial IntelligenceCybersecurity Outlook

📢 Share This Article

Help others stay informed about cybersecurity threats

Continue Reading