Hacker Group 'HawkSec' Claims Breach of 184 Million TotalEnergies Records

"HawkSec" Hacker Group Claims Massive Data Breach at French Energy Giant TotalEnergies, Allegedly Stealing 184 Million Customer Records

HIGH
January 16, 2026
6m read
Data BreachThreat Actor

Impact Scope

People Affected

183.9 million records

Industries Affected

Energy

Geographic Impact

France (national)

Related Entities

Threat Actors

HawkSec

Organizations

Cybernews

Other

TotalEnergies DiscordOrange Rwanda

Full Report

Executive Summary

A nascent hacking group, HawkSec, has claimed a significant data breach against French energy giant TotalEnergies. The group alleges it has exfiltrated a database containing 183.9 million records of French customers, including highly sensitive Personally Identifiable Information (PII) and financial data like bank account numbers. The attackers have posted samples of the allegedly stolen data on social media to add credibility to their claims. As of January 16, 2026, TotalEnergies has not confirmed the breach. The incident is under investigation, and the veracity of HawkSec's claims is still being assessed by the cybersecurity community. If confirmed, this would represent a major data breach with severe implications for millions of individuals.


Threat Overview

The threat actor, HawkSec, appears to be a new entrant to the cybercrime scene. Their claim against TotalEnergies is part of a string of alleged breaches, including against Discord and Orange Rwanda, none of which have been independently verified. The group is attempting to sell the allegedly stolen database on a criminal forum.

The tactic is straightforward data theft and extortion. By leaking samples of sensitive data, the group aims to create public pressure on TotalEnergies and attract buyers for the full database. The claimed data includes:

  • Customer Emails
  • Client IDs
  • Bank Account Numbers
  • Home Addresses
  • Phone Numbers

This type of information is a goldmine for criminals, who can use it for identity theft, sophisticated phishing campaigns, and financial fraud. The data appears to originate from the customer-facing website for TotalEnergies' French utility services.


Technical Analysis

Details on the initial access vector and TTPs are currently unavailable, as the breach is unconfirmed. However, a hypothetical attack chain for this type of data theft from a large web application would likely involve:

  1. Initial Access: Exploitation of a vulnerability in the public-facing website, such as SQL Injection (T1506 - SQL Injection), or compromise of a developer or administrator account via phishing (T1566 - Phishing).

  2. Discovery: Once inside, the attacker would probe the internal network or application backend to locate the primary customer database.

  3. Collection & Exfiltration: The attacker would then execute a database dump, collecting the target tables into a single file (T1025 - Data from Removable Media). This large file would then be exfiltrated over a covert channel, possibly disguised as normal web traffic (T1041 - Exfiltration Over C2 Channel).

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping (Hypothetical)

Tactic Technique ID Technique Name
Initial Access T1506 SQL Injection
Credential Access T1555 Credentials from Password Stores
Collection T1025 Data from Removable Media
Exfiltration T1041 Exfiltration Over C2 Channel

Impact Assessment

If HawkSec's claims are legitimate, the impact would be severe:

  • Massive Customer Risk: Nearly 184 million records containing PII and financial data would expose a huge number of French citizens to identity theft, targeted phishing attacks (e.g., pretending to be from TotalEnergies), and direct financial fraud.
  • Regulatory Fines: A breach of this magnitude involving EU citizens' data would trigger a massive fine under GDPR, potentially costing TotalEnergies up to 4% of its global annual turnover.
  • Reputational Damage: The failure to protect customer data would severely damage TotalEnergies' brand and customer trust, potentially leading to customer churn.
  • Incident Response Costs: The costs for forensic investigation, customer notification, credit monitoring services, and system remediation would be substantial.

Cyber Observables for Detection

To detect such a breach, organizations should monitor for:

Type Value Description
log_source Database query logs Look for unusually large or broad queries, such as SELECT * FROM customers, especially when initiated from an unexpected source IP or user account.
network_traffic_pattern Large outbound data transfer A sudden, large data transfer from a database server to an external IP is a primary indicator of a database dump exfiltration.
log_source WAF logs Monitor for patterns of SQL injection attacks or other web vulnerability scanning.
user_account_pattern Anomalous login A login to a database administration tool from an unfamiliar IP address or at an unusual time.

Detection & Response

  • Database Activity Monitoring (DAM): Deploy DAM solutions to monitor all queries to critical databases. Establish baselines for normal activity and alert on deviations, such as queries accessing an abnormally large number of rows or queries originating from the web server application user that are not part of normal application logic.
  • File Integrity Monitoring (FIM): Monitor critical servers for the creation of large archive files (.zip, .sql, .bak), which are often used to stage data for exfiltration.
  • Network Data Loss Prevention (DLP): Use network DLP solutions to inspect outbound traffic for patterns matching sensitive data, such as bank account numbers or national ID numbers, and block such transfers.

Mitigation

Preventing large-scale database exfiltration requires a combination of web application security and backend infrastructure protection.

  1. Secure Coding & Vulnerability Management (M1051): Regularly scan web applications for vulnerabilities like SQL injection and Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). Remediate all identified flaws promptly. This is a form of Software Update (D3-SU) applied to custom code.

  2. Web Application Firewall (WAF) (M1021): Deploy a WAF to protect against common web attacks and provide a virtual patch for vulnerabilities that have not yet been remediated in the code.

  3. Least Privilege Access (M1026): Ensure that the user account used by the web application to connect to the database has the minimum necessary permissions. It should not have permissions to perform a full database dump or access tables outside of its required scope.

  4. Encrypt Sensitive Information (M1041): Sensitive data within the database, such as bank account numbers, should be encrypted at rest. This ensures that even if the data is stolen, it is unusable to the attacker without the decryption keys. This maps to File Encryption (D3-FE) at the data layer.

Timeline of Events

1
January 16, 2026
This article was published

MITRE ATT&CK Mitigations

Regularly scanning for and remediating web application vulnerabilities like SQLi is fundamental to preventing database breaches.

Mapped D3FEND Techniques:

A Web Application Firewall (WAF) can provide a critical defense layer by blocking common web attack patterns.

Mapped D3FEND Techniques:

Encrypting sensitive data at rest ensures that even if the database is stolen, the most critical information remains protected.

Mapped D3FEND Techniques:

D3FEND Defensive Countermeasures

To prevent the likely initial access vector of a web application exploit, TotalEnergies should leverage a Web Application Firewall (WAF) to perform deep Inbound Traffic Filtering. The WAF should be configured with rulesets to detect and block common attack patterns, especially SQL injection. For example, rules should block requests containing SQL keywords like UNION, SELECT, --, or xp_cmdshell in URL parameters or form fields. This acts as a crucial shield for the application, potentially blocking an attack even if the underlying code is vulnerable. It is a critical compensating control for large, complex web platforms where immediate code-level patching might be difficult.

Detecting a large-scale data dump requires Resource Access Pattern Analysis, specifically through a Database Activity Monitoring (DAM) solution. A DAM tool should be deployed to monitor all queries to the customer database. A baseline of normal activity for the web application's service account must be established. The system should then be configured to trigger a high-severity alert if this account performs an action outside its baseline, such as querying an entire table (SELECT *), accessing an unusually high number of rows in a short period, or attempting to query system or metadata tables. This behavioral analysis can detect an active breach in progress, allowing security teams to intervene before the entire 184 million records are exfiltrated.

To mitigate the impact of a successful database exfiltration, sensitive data like bank account numbers must be protected with strong encryption at rest. This can be achieved through application-level encryption, where the application encrypts the data before writing it to the database, or transparent data encryption (TDE) provided by the database management system. The encryption keys must be stored separately and securely, for example in a Hardware Security Module (HSM). If HawkSec had exfiltrated the database but the bank account numbers were encrypted, the value of the stolen data and the risk to customers would be dramatically lower, as the most sensitive information would be rendered useless without the corresponding keys.

Sources & References

Attackers claim theft of 183M records from major oil company
Cybernews (cybernews.com) January 16, 2026

Article Author

Jason Gomes

Jason Gomes

• Cybersecurity Practitioner

Cybersecurity professional with over 10 years of specialized experience in security operations, threat intelligence, incident response, and security automation. Expertise spans SOAR/XSOAR orchestration, threat intelligence platforms, SIEM/UEBA analytics, and building cyber fusion centers. Background includes technical enablement, solution architecture for enterprise and government clients, and implementing security automation workflows across IR, TIP, and SOC use cases.

Threat Intelligence & AnalysisSecurity Orchestration (SOAR/XSOAR)Incident Response & Digital ForensicsSecurity Operations Center (SOC)SIEM & Security AnalyticsCyber Fusion & Threat SharingSecurity Automation & IntegrationManaged Detection & Response (MDR)

Tags

HawkSecData BreachTotalEnergiesEnergy SectorGDPRPII

📢 Share This Article

Help others stay informed about cybersecurity threats

Continue Reading