'BRIDGE:BREAK' Vulnerabilities Expose Thousands of Serial-to-IP Converters

22 'BRIDGE:BREAK' Flaws Expose Lantronix and Silex Serial-to-IP Converters to RCE and Takeover

HIGH
April 22, 2026
4m read
VulnerabilityIndustrial Control SystemsIoT Security

Related Entities

Organizations

Products & Tech

Lantronix EDS3000PS SeriesLantronix EDS5000 SeriesSilex SD330-AC

CVE Identifiers

Full Report

Executive Summary

Researchers at Forescout's Vedere Labs have uncovered a set of 22 vulnerabilities, collectively named BRIDGE:BREAK, that impact widely used serial-to-IP converters manufactured by Lantronix and Silex. These devices are critical components in many Operational Technology (OT) environments, connecting legacy serial-based devices (like PLCs and sensors) to modern IP networks. The flaws range in severity and include critical vulnerabilities that could allow an attacker to achieve remote code execution (RCE), bypass authentication, and gain full control over the device. With thousands of these converters exposed on the public internet, these vulnerabilities represent a significant threat to the stability and security of industrial control systems (ICS) globally.

Vulnerability Details

The BRIDGE:BREAK vulnerabilities encompass a wide range of issues, demonstrating systemic weaknesses in the affected products. The 22 flaws include:

  • Remote Code Execution: Allowing an attacker to run arbitrary code on the converter.
  • Authentication Bypass: Enabling an attacker to gain administrative access without valid credentials.
  • Denial of Service (DoS): Allowing an attacker to crash the device, disrupting communication with critical field assets.
  • Firmware Tampering: Enabling an attacker to install a persistent, malicious firmware image.
  • Data Tampering: Allowing an attacker to perform man-in-the-middle attacks, intercepting and modifying data transmitted between the serial device and the IP network.

Several CVEs have been assigned, including CVE-2026-32955, CVE-2026-32956, and CVE-2026-32961.

Affected Systems

  • Lantronix: EDS3000PS Series, EDS5000 Series
  • Silex: SD330-AC

Forescout's research identified nearly 20,000 of these devices exposed to the internet, creating a large, easily accessible attack surface for threat actors.

Exploitation Status

While there is no public report of active exploitation in the wild at this time, the public disclosure of these vulnerabilities, along with their severity, means that threat actors will likely begin scanning for and attempting to exploit vulnerable devices shortly.

Impact Assessment

Successful exploitation of the BRIDGE:BREAK vulnerabilities could have severe consequences in an OT environment:

  • Disruption of Physical Processes: By taking control of a converter, an attacker could send malicious commands to or stop communication with connected ICS equipment (e.g., PLCs, RTUs), potentially causing physical damage or shutting down a manufacturing line or utility service.
  • Lateral Movement: A compromised converter can serve as a pivot point for an attacker to move deeper into the OT or corporate network.
  • False Data Injection: Attackers could tamper with sensor readings being sent from the field, blinding operators to a dangerous condition or causing them to take incorrect actions.
  • Loss of Control: Complete takeover of the device allows for persistent compromise and long-term espionage or sabotage.

These converters are the 'digital duct tape' of the OT world, connecting old and new. A vulnerability in them is not just a software bug; it's a threat to the physical world.

Cyber Observables — Hunting Hints

The following patterns can help identify vulnerable devices or exploitation attempts:

Type
Network Traffic Pattern
Value
Inbound connections to Lantronix/Silex devices from unknown internet IPs.
Description
These devices should ideally not be exposed to the internet. Any inbound connection is suspicious.
Type
Port
Value
Default admin ports (e.g., Telnet 23, HTTP 80, HTTPS 443)
Description
Scanning for these ports can identify exposed devices.
Type
Configuration
Value
Default credentials (e.g., admin/admin)
Description
Many devices are deployed with weak or default credentials, which should be checked.

Detection Methods

  • Asset Inventory: Use network scanning tools (e.g., Nmap, Shodan) or passive discovery tools to identify all Lantronix and Silex devices on your network.
  • Vulnerability Scanning: Scan identified devices with a vulnerability scanner that has plugins for the BRIDGE:BREAK CVEs.
  • Network Monitoring: Monitor network traffic to and from these devices for anomalous behavior, such as connections to unusual IP addresses, large data transfers, or attempts to use debugging interfaces.

Remediation Steps

  1. Isolate from the Internet: The most critical step is to ensure these devices are not exposed to the public internet. Place them behind firewalls and use VPNs for any required remote access. This is a direct application of M1030 - Network Segmentation.
  2. Apply Patches: Both Lantronix and Silex have released patches. Organizations must apply these updates as soon as possible. See M1051 - Update Software.
  3. Change Default Credentials: Immediately change any default or weak credentials on these devices to strong, unique passwords.
  4. Network Segmentation: Segment the network so that the converters are in a protected OT zone, separate from the corporate IT network, to limit the blast radius of a potential compromise.

Timeline of Events

1
April 22, 2026
This article was published

MITRE ATT&CK Mitigations

Do not expose OT devices directly to the internet. Place them in a segmented network zone protected by a firewall.

Mapped D3FEND Techniques:

Apply the firmware patches provided by Lantronix and Silex to remediate the vulnerabilities.

Mapped D3FEND Techniques:

Change default credentials and enforce the use of strong, unique passwords for all device management interfaces.

Mapped D3FEND Techniques:

D3FEND Defensive Countermeasures

The single most effective countermeasure against the BRIDGE:BREAK vulnerabilities is to ensure that affected Lantronix and Silex devices are not exposed to the public internet. The fact that Forescout found nearly 20,000 devices online is a critical failure of security fundamentals. Asset owners must immediately identify these devices on their networks and place them behind a firewall, within a properly segmented OT or ICS network zone. Any required remote access should be facilitated through a secure VPN with multi-factor authentication, terminating in a DMZ, with traffic strictly controlled to the specific device. This act of network isolation removes the primary attack vector and dramatically reduces the risk of exploitation by external threat actors.

For devices that remain in operation, applying the firmware updates provided by Lantronix and Silex is mandatory. This is the only way to fix the underlying vulnerabilities, including the critical remote code execution and authentication bypass flaws. The patching process in an OT environment must be carefully managed: test the patch in a non-production environment if possible, schedule a maintenance window to minimize operational disruption, and have a rollback plan in case the update causes issues with connected legacy equipment. While patching OT can be challenging, the risk of leaving a device with known, critical RCE vulnerabilities on the network is unacceptable, especially for devices that bridge IT and OT environments.

Sources & References

Article Author

Jason Gomes

Jason Gomes

• Cybersecurity Practitioner

Cybersecurity professional with over 10 years of specialized experience in security operations, threat intelligence, incident response, and security automation. Expertise spans SOAR/XSOAR orchestration, threat intelligence platforms, SIEM/UEBA analytics, and building cyber fusion centers. Background includes technical enablement, solution architecture for enterprise and government clients, and implementing security automation workflows across IR, TIP, and SOC use cases.

Threat Intelligence & AnalysisSecurity Orchestration (SOAR/XSOAR)Incident Response & Digital ForensicsSecurity Operations Center (SOC)SIEM & Security AnalyticsCyber Fusion & Threat SharingSecurity Automation & IntegrationManaged Detection & Response (MDR)

Tags

VulnerabilityICSOTForescoutLantronixSilexRCE

📢 Share This Article

Help others stay informed about cybersecurity threats