CISA Adds Critical SmarterMail RCE Flaw to KEV Catalog Amid Active Ransomware Attacks

CISA Mandates Patch for Actively Exploited SmarterMail RCE Vulnerability (CVE-2026-24423) Used in Ransomware Campaigns

CRITICAL
February 7, 2026
February 8, 2026
5m read
VulnerabilityRansomwarePatch Management

Related Entities(initial)

Organizations

CISA SmarterTools watchTowrCODE WHITE GmbHVulnCheck

Products & Tech

SmarterMail

CVE Identifiers

CVE-2026-24423
CRITICAL
CVSS:9.8

Full Report(when first published)

Executive Summary

On February 6, 2026, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) added CVE-2026-24423, a critical unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in SmarterTools' SmarterMail, to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. The action was prompted by evidence of active exploitation in the wild by ransomware groups. The vulnerability affects SmarterMail versions prior to build v100.0.9511 and allows attackers to take complete control of affected email servers. Due to the high risk of data theft and ransomware deployment, CISA has mandated that Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies patch the flaw by February 26, 2026. All organizations are strongly advised to prioritize patching immediately.

Vulnerability Details

The vulnerability, identified as CVE-2026-24423, is classified as a 'Missing Authentication for Critical Function' (CWE-306). It exists in the ConnectToHub API method within the SmarterMail software. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this flaw by sending a specially crafted POST request to the /api/v1/settings/sysadmin/connect-to-hub endpoint. This request forces the vulnerable server to connect to an attacker-controlled HTTP server. The malicious server can then respond with operating system commands, which the SmarterMail application executes with its own privileges, leading to full remote code execution on the underlying host.

Affected Systems

  • Product: SmarterMail
  • Vendor: SmarterTools
  • Affected Versions: All versions prior to build v100.0.9511

Exploitation Status

CISA has confirmed that CVE-2026-24423 is being actively exploited in the wild. Threat actors, specifically ransomware operators, are leveraging this vulnerability for initial access into target networks. Email servers are high-value targets as they often contain sensitive communications, credentials, and proprietary data. Successful exploitation provides a powerful foothold for attackers to deploy ransomware, exfiltrate data for double extortion, and pivot to other systems within the network.

This is the third SmarterMail vulnerability to be added to the KEV catalog in recent weeks, following CVE-2025-52691 and CVE-2026-23760, indicating a sustained focus by threat actors on this particular software.

Impact Assessment

Exploitation of CVE-2026-24423 poses a critical risk to organizations. The business impact includes:

  • Data Breach: Complete loss of confidentiality for all email communications and attachments stored on the server.
  • Ransomware Deployment: Disruption of business operations due to file encryption, leading to significant financial costs from downtime and potential ransom payments.
  • Reputational Damage: Loss of customer and partner trust following a breach.
  • Lateral Movement: The compromised server can be used as a staging ground for further attacks across the internal network, escalating the scope of the incident.

Given the unauthenticated nature of the exploit and its direct path to RCE, the barrier to entry for attackers is low, making widespread attacks highly probable.

Cyber Observables for Detection

Security teams should hunt for signs of compromise by monitoring for the following activity:

Type Value Description
url_pattern /api/v1/settings/sysadmin/connect-to-hub The vulnerable API endpoint. Any POST requests to this URL from untrusted external IP addresses are highly suspicious.
process_name MailService.exe The primary SmarterMail process. Monitor this process for unusual child processes (e.g., cmd.exe, powershell.exe) or outbound network connections to unknown IPs.
network_traffic_pattern Outbound HTTP connections from SmarterMail server to non-standard ports or unknown IP addresses. Attackers' malicious servers may listen on non-80/443 ports.

Detection & Response

Defenders should implement the following detection and response strategies:

  1. Web Log Analysis: Actively monitor web server and reverse proxy logs for POST requests to the /api/v1/settings/sysadmin/connect-to-hub endpoint. Any such requests originating from external, untrusted IP addresses should be treated as an active exploitation attempt. Use a SIEM to create an alert for this specific activity.

  2. Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR): Monitor the SmarterMail server for suspicious process execution chains. The MailService.exe process should not be spawning command shells or scripting engines like powershell.exe. Create detection rules for this behavior.

  3. Network Traffic Monitoring: Analyze network traffic originating from the SmarterMail server. Look for outbound HTTP/HTTPS connections to unusual or newly registered domains and IP addresses. Attackers need to connect back to their C2 server to serve commands.

Mitigation

Immediate action is required to mitigate this threat.

  1. Patch Immediately: The most critical action is to update all SmarterMail instances to build v100.0.9511 or later. This is the only way to fully remediate the vulnerability.

  2. Restrict Access: As a compensating control, restrict access to the SmarterMail web interface. It should not be exposed directly to the internet. Place it behind a VPN or a reverse proxy with a web application firewall (WAF) that can filter malicious requests. Configure firewall rules to only allow access from trusted IP ranges.

  3. Assume Compromise: Given the active exploitation, organizations that find unpatched, internet-facing systems should assume they are compromised and initiate incident response procedures. This includes hunting for backdoors, unauthorized accounts, and signs of lateral movement.

Timeline of Events

1
February 6, 2026
CISA adds CVE-2026-24423 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog.
2
February 7, 2026
This article was published
3
February 26, 2026
Deadline for U.S. FCEB agencies to patch CVE-2026-24423.

Article Updates

February 8, 2026

New details for SmarterMail RCE (CVE-2026-24423) include CVSS 9.3 score, clarification of API endpoint, and impact on 15M users.

MITRE ATT&CK Mitigations

Applying the vendor-supplied patch (to build v100.0.9511 or later) is the most effective way to eliminate the vulnerability.

Restrict access to the SmarterMail web interface from the internet using a firewall, WAF, or VPN to reduce the attack surface.

Audit

M1047enterprise

Regularly audit web server and EDR logs for signs of exploitation, such as requests to the vulnerable endpoint or suspicious process creation.

Ensure the SmarterMail server is not directly exposed to the internet. Place it in a segmented network zone and control access via a reverse proxy or VPN.

D3FEND Defensive Countermeasures

The primary and most critical defensive action is to immediately apply the security update provided by SmarterTools. All instances of SmarterMail must be updated to build v100.0.9511 or a later version. This patch directly addresses the missing authentication vulnerability in the ConnectToHub API method, closing the RCE vector. Prioritize patching on internet-facing servers first, followed by internal instances. After patching, verify the build number in the SmarterMail admin interface to confirm the update was successful. Given that this vulnerability is under active exploitation by ransomware groups, delaying this update carries a significant risk of full system compromise. Establish an automated patch management process to ensure future critical updates are applied in a timely manner.

As a vital compensating control, especially if patching cannot be performed immediately, organizations must restrict network access to the SmarterMail management interface. Use a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or reverse proxy to block external access to the specific vulnerable endpoint: /api/v1/settings/sysadmin/connect-to-hub. Furthermore, configure perimeter firewalls to deny all access to the web interface from the public internet. Access should be restricted to a limited set of internal IP addresses used by administrators, preferably through a secure VPN connection. This technique of network hardening significantly reduces the attack surface, preventing unauthenticated attackers from reaching the vulnerable API call in the first place. This is a critical defense-in-depth measure that protects against this and future web-based vulnerabilities.

Deploy and configure an Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solution on the SmarterMail server to monitor for post-exploitation activity. Specifically, create detection rules that alert on the MailService.exe process spawning suspicious child processes, such as cmd.exe, powershell.exe, or any other script interpreters. In a normal operating state, the mail service process should not be executing command shells. Baselining the server's normal process activity is key. An alert on this behavior is a high-confidence indicator of compromise, suggesting an attacker has successfully exploited the RCE flaw and is attempting to execute commands. This allows security teams to detect a breach in progress and rapidly initiate incident response to contain the threat before ransomware can be deployed or data exfiltrated.

Sources & References(when first published)

Article Author

Jason Gomes

Jason Gomes

• Cybersecurity Practitioner

Cybersecurity professional with over 10 years of specialized experience in security operations, threat intelligence, incident response, and security automation. Expertise spans SOAR/XSOAR orchestration, threat intelligence platforms, SIEM/UEBA analytics, and building cyber fusion centers. Background includes technical enablement, solution architecture for enterprise and government clients, and implementing security automation workflows across IR, TIP, and SOC use cases.

Threat Intelligence & AnalysisSecurity Orchestration (SOAR/XSOAR)Incident Response & Digital ForensicsSecurity Operations Center (SOC)SIEM & Security AnalyticsCyber Fusion & Threat SharingSecurity Automation & IntegrationManaged Detection & Response (MDR)

Tags

RCEUnauthenticatedKEVEmail ServerAPI SecurityCWE-306

📢 Share This Article

Help others stay informed about cybersecurity threats

Continue Reading