Australian Fertility Clinic Genea Hit by 'Termite' Ransomware Gang

'Termite' Ransomware Gang Claims Attack on Australian Fertility Clinic Genea, Steals 700GB of Patient Data

HIGH
December 21, 2025
5m read
RansomwareData BreachThreat Actor

Related Entities

Threat Actors

Termite

Other

GeneaBabuk

Full Report

Executive Summary

Genea, a prominent Australian fertility service provider, has become the latest victim in a string of cyberattacks targeting the nation's healthcare sector. The financially motivated 'Termite' ransomware gang has claimed responsibility for the attack, asserting that it has stolen approximately 700GB of highly sensitive patient data. This includes medical histories and private diagnostic results. The incident is a classic double-extortion attack, where the threat actor not only encrypts the victim's data but also exfiltrates it to pressure payment. The compromise of such deeply personal information poses a grave risk to patient privacy and safety.

Threat Overview

The attack was carried out by the 'Termite' ransomware group, a relatively new but aggressive actor in the cybercrime landscape. This group is known to utilize a modified variant of the Babuk ransomware source code, which was leaked online in 2021. This allows them and other groups to easily adapt and deploy a potent ransomware strain.

Following the intrusion into Genea's network, the Termite gang exfiltrated a large volume of data before executing the encryption payload. By announcing the breach and the data theft on their leak site, they aim to publicly shame the victim and create panic among patients, thereby increasing the pressure on Genea to pay the ransom demand to prevent the public release of the stolen information.

Technical Analysis

The attack likely employed common ransomware TTPs, leveraging the capabilities of the Babuk codebase.

  • Initial Access: The initial vector was not specified, but common methods for ransomware include exploiting public-facing vulnerabilities, spearphishing campaigns, or using compromised credentials.
  • Data Exfiltration: T1567.002 - Exfiltration to Cloud Storage: Before encryption, attackers exfiltrate large volumes of data (700GB in this case) to attacker-controlled cloud storage to be used as leverage.
  • Impact: T1486 - Data Encrypted for Impact: The core of the attack involves using the Babuk ransomware variant to encrypt files across the network, rendering systems and data inaccessible.
  • Inhibit System Recovery: T1490 - Inhibit System Recovery: Babuk and similar ransomware families often attempt to delete volume shadow copies and other backups to prevent easy recovery.

The use of leaked ransomware source code like Babuk has lowered the barrier to entry for new criminal groups like Termite, leading to a proliferation of capable threat actors.

Impact Assessment

The impact of this breach on Genea and its patients is profound and multi-faceted.

  • Extreme Patient Harm: The stolen data—fertility treatments, medical histories, diagnostic results—is exceptionally sensitive. Its release could lead to emotional distress, social stigma, and personal extortion attempts against individual patients.
  • Operational Disruption: The encryption of systems would severely disrupt Genea's operations, potentially delaying or canceling patient treatments and compromising care.
  • Regulatory Fines and Legal Action: As a healthcare provider, Genea is subject to strict data protection regulations. The breach will likely trigger investigations from privacy commissioners and could result in significant fines and class-action lawsuits.
  • High-Value Data on Dark Web: The stolen data is highly valuable to other criminals for targeted phishing, identity theft, and complex fraud schemes.

Cyber Observables for Detection

While no specific IOCs were provided, security teams can hunt for behaviors associated with Babuk ransomware.

Type Value Description
file_name *.babyk A common file extension used by Babuk ransomware for encrypted files.
file_name How To Restore Your Files.txt The typical name of the ransom note left by Babuk.
command_line_pattern vssadmin.exe delete shadows /all /quiet Command used to delete Volume Shadow Copies to prevent recovery.

Detection & Response

  • EDR/XDR Monitoring: Deploy endpoint detection and response tools configured to detect ransomware behaviors, such as rapid file modification, deletion of shadow copies, and attempts to disable security tools.
  • Network Data Loss Prevention (DLP): Monitor for large, anomalous data egress from the network. 700GB of data exfiltration should trigger alarms in a properly configured environment.
  • Threat Intelligence: Subscribe to threat intelligence feeds to get early warnings about new ransomware groups like Termite and their associated IOCs and TTPs.
  • D3FEND Techniques: Utilize D3-FCR: File Content Rules to detect known ransomware file patterns and D3-PA: Process Analysis to identify suspicious process chains indicative of ransomware execution.

Mitigation

  • Offline and Immutable Backups: The number one defense against ransomware is having a robust backup strategy. Follow the 3-2-1 rule (three copies, two different media, one offsite/offline/immutable). This allows for recovery without paying the ransom.
  • Network Segmentation: Restrict lateral movement by segmenting the network. Patient databases should be on a highly restricted network segment, with strict access controls limiting which users and systems can connect to them.
  • Phishing-Resistant MFA: Implement phishing-resistant Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for all remote access and critical system logins to prevent initial access via compromised credentials.
  • User Training: Train employees to recognize and report phishing attempts, as this remains a primary initial access vector for ransomware.

Timeline of Events

1
December 21, 2025
This article was published

MITRE ATT&CK Mitigations

Properly configuring systems to create and protect backups (e.g., Volume Shadow Copies) and ensuring they are stored immutably or offline is the primary defense against data destruction by ransomware.

Isolating critical patient data systems would prevent attackers from accessing and exfiltrating the 700GB of data even if they gained a foothold elsewhere in the network.

Mapped D3FEND Techniques:

Modern EDR and antivirus solutions can detect and block ransomware execution based on behavioral analysis and signatures for known families like Babuk.

Mapped D3FEND Techniques:

D3FEND Defensive Countermeasures

The primary countermeasure to recover from a ransomware attack like the one on Genea is a robust backup and restoration strategy. Genea must maintain multiple, geographically separate, and immutable backups of all critical patient data and system configurations. 'Immutable' means the backups cannot be altered or deleted, even by an administrator account that an attacker might compromise. This is often achieved with cloud storage object locks or on specialized backup appliances. Regular, automated testing of these backups is non-negotiable to ensure they can be successfully restored in a crisis. This capability allows the organization to restore operations and data without paying the ransom, effectively neutralizing the encryption portion of the attack. While it doesn't prevent data exfiltration, it is the only way to guarantee business continuity.

To combat the double-extortion tactic used by the Termite gang, Genea should implement a Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solution capable of User Data Transfer Analysis. Such a system would monitor and analyze network egress traffic to detect and block the exfiltration of the 700GB of patient data. The system should be configured with rules to identify Protected Health Information (PHI) and other sensitive data patterns. It should establish a baseline of normal data transfer volumes and destinations, and trigger high-priority alerts when massive, anomalous transfers are detected, especially to untrusted destinations like consumer cloud storage. This provides a critical opportunity to detect an active breach before the final ransomware payload is deployed, potentially stopping the most damaging aspect of the attack—the public leak of patient data.

Sources & References

Threat Intelligence Report
Fujitsu (fujitsu.com) December 20, 2025

Article Author

Jason Gomes

Jason Gomes

• Cybersecurity Practitioner

Cybersecurity professional with over 10 years of specialized experience in security operations, threat intelligence, incident response, and security automation. Expertise spans SOAR/XSOAR orchestration, threat intelligence platforms, SIEM/UEBA analytics, and building cyber fusion centers. Background includes technical enablement, solution architecture for enterprise and government clients, and implementing security automation workflows across IR, TIP, and SOC use cases.

Threat Intelligence & AnalysisSecurity Orchestration (SOAR/XSOAR)Incident Response & Digital ForensicsSecurity Operations Center (SOC)SIEM & Security AnalyticsCyber Fusion & Threat SharingSecurity Automation & IntegrationManaged Detection & Response (MDR)

Tags

TermiteRansomwareData BreachHealthcareAustraliaGeneaBabuk

📢 Share This Article

Help others stay informed about cybersecurity threats

Continue Reading