Over 10,000 Fortinet Firewalls Exposed to Critical 2FA Bypass Flaw

Actively Exploited 2FA Bypass Flaw (CVE-2020-12812) Leaves Over 10,000 Fortinet Firewalls Vulnerable

CRITICAL
January 3, 2026
5m read
VulnerabilityPatch ManagementCyberattack

Impact Scope

People Affected

Over 10,000 organizations exposed

Industries Affected

GovernmentTechnologyFinanceHealthcareManufacturing

Geographic Impact

United States (global)

Related Entities

Organizations

Fortinet Shadowserver FoundationCISA FBI

Products & Tech

FortiGate SSL VPNFortiOSActive Directory

CVE Identifiers

CVE-2020-12812
CRITICAL
CVSS:9.8

Full Report

Executive Summary

A critical two-factor authentication (2FA) bypass vulnerability in Fortinet FortiGate SSL VPNs, CVE-2020-12812, continues to pose a severe threat despite being five years old. As of January 2, 2026, the Shadowserver Foundation reports that over 10,000 firewalls remain unpatched and publicly exposed. The flaw, with a CVSS score of 9.8, is actively exploited in the wild and allows an attacker who has already obtained a user's password to completely bypass the second authentication factor (FortiToken). The exploit is trivial, requiring the attacker to simply change the case of the username during the login attempt. The vulnerability's persistence highlights a significant failure in patch management across thousands of organizations, leaving critical network gateways open to takeover. The CISA added this flaw to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog in 2022.

Vulnerability Details

  • CVE ID: CVE-2020-12812
  • CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical)
  • Description: The vulnerability is an improper authentication flaw that exists in the SSL VPN login portal when it is configured to use LDAP for authentication along with FortiToken-based 2FA.
  • Attack Vector: An attacker with knowledge of a valid LDAP username and password can bypass 2FA. The exploit works because the FortiGate device's authentication daemon treats usernames as case-sensitive, while the backend LDAP server (like Active Directory) typically treats them as case-insensitive. By submitting the username with a different case (e.g., Jsmith instead of jsmith), the attacker's login attempt does not match the username configured for 2FA on the FortiGate. The FortiGate therefore does not prompt for a token. However, it then passes the credentials to the LDAP server, which successfully authenticates the user because it ignores the case difference. The result is a successful login with only a single factor.

Affected Systems

  • Product: Fortinet FortiGate SSL VPN
  • Affected Versions: FortiOS versions before 6.4.1, 6.2.4, and 6.0.10.
  • Configuration: The vulnerability only applies when the SSL VPN is configured for LDAP authentication and has 2FA enabled for some, but not all, users.

As of early January 2026, over 10,000 vulnerable systems are still online globally, with the highest concentration in the United States (>1,300).

Exploitation Status

The vulnerability is actively and widely exploited. CISA and the FBI first issued a warning in 2021 that state-sponsored actors were leveraging this flaw. Its inclusion in the CISA KEV catalog underscores its status as a persistent threat used by multiple threat actors to gain initial access to corporate and government networks.

Impact Assessment

Exploiting CVE-2020-12812 grants an attacker full access to the VPN, effectively placing them inside the target's network perimeter. This has several severe consequences:

  • Network Compromise: The attacker can access internal resources, move laterally through the network, and deploy further malware, such as ransomware.
  • Data Exfiltration: Once inside, the attacker can steal sensitive corporate data, intellectual property, and customer information.
  • Loss of Trust in 2FA: This flaw undermines the security promise of 2FA, demonstrating that even organizations that have deployed it can be vulnerable if systems are not properly configured and maintained.
  • Regulatory and Compliance Failure: For organizations subject to regulations requiring MFA, operating a system with this known flaw could be considered a compliance failure.

Cyber Observables for Detection

  • VPN authentication logs showing successful logins where the submitted username case does not match the stored username.
  • Network scans from external IPs targeting the SSL VPN port (e.g., TCP/443, TCP/10443) on FortiGate devices.
  • Post-compromise activity originating from a new VPN client IP address shortly after a successful login.
Type Value Description Context Confidence
log_source FortiGate VPN Logs Look for successful authentication events where the user field has a different capitalization than expected for that account. SIEM, Log Analysis high
event_id FortiGate Event ID 40962 A successful SSL VPN login. Correlate this with user account case and location data. FortiGate Logs medium
url_pattern /remote/login The login page for the FortiGate SSL VPN. Monitor for brute-force or credential stuffing attempts against this page. Web Logs, WAF Logs medium

Detection Methods

  • Vulnerability Scanning: Use a vulnerability scanner (e.g., Nessus, Qualys) with up-to-date plugins to scan for CVE-2020-12812 on all public-facing FortiGate devices.
  • Log Auditing: Actively audit VPN authentication logs. Create a SIEM rule that alerts when a successful LDAP authentication occurs for a user account, but the username string in the log does not exactly match the canonical username stored in Active Directory (e.g., JSmith vs jsmith). This is a direct indicator of an exploitation attempt.
  • Asset Inventory: Maintain a complete and accurate inventory of all perimeter devices, including their firmware versions, to quickly identify unpatched systems.

Remediation Steps

  1. Patch Immediately: The top priority is to upgrade all vulnerable FortiGate devices to a patched version of FortiOS (6.4.1, 6.2.4, 6.0.10 or newer). This is the only way to fully remediate the vulnerability. This is a critical application of D3-SU: Software Update.
  2. Workaround (Temporary): If patching is not immediately possible, Fortinet provided a workaround. Create a unique LDAP group for all VPN users who require 2FA and configure the FortiGate to apply 2FA to that entire group, rather than individual users. This ensures that all members of the group are prompted for 2FA regardless of username case.
  3. Hunt for Compromise: After patching, assume compromise. Review all VPN logs for the past several months for signs of suspicious logins. Hunt for any anomalous activity originating from VPN client IP pools. Consider a broad password reset for all VPN users.

Timeline of Events

1
July 1, 2020
Fortinet releases patches for CVE-2020-12812.
2
May 1, 2022
CISA adds CVE-2020-12812 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog.
3
January 2, 2026
The Shadowserver Foundation reports over 10,000 firewalls remain vulnerable and are being actively exploited.
4
January 3, 2026
This article was published

MITRE ATT&CK Mitigations

The primary mitigation is to apply the patches provided by Fortinet immediately. This is a critical patch management failure.

Mapped D3FEND Techniques:

Audit

M1047enterprise

Regularly audit VPN authentication logs for signs of compromise, such as username case mismatches in successful logins.

Even if an attacker gains VPN access, strong internal network segmentation can limit their ability to move laterally and access critical assets.

Mapped D3FEND Techniques:

D3FEND Defensive Countermeasures

The existence of over 10,000 unpatched FortiGate devices five years after a patch was released for a critical, actively exploited vulnerability is a catastrophic failure of patch management. The absolute, number one priority for any organization running a vulnerable FortiOS version is to update the software immediately. This is not a suggestion; it is an emergency. All other mitigations are secondary. A robust patch management program for internet-facing devices is non-negotiable. This involves maintaining an accurate asset inventory, subscribing to vendor security advisories, and having a process to test and deploy critical patches within 24-48 hours of release, especially for vulnerabilities listed in CISA's KEV catalog.

Organizations must assume their patch management will fail at some point and have a verification process. Regular, authenticated and unauthenticated vulnerability scanning of the entire external attack surface is essential. For this specific Fortinet issue, an external scan would have immediately flagged CVE-2020-12812. This provides a critical safety net to identify gaps in the patching process. Scanning should be performed at least weekly, and the results should be fed directly into a ticketing system for the network or security team with strict SLAs for remediation of critical findings.

As a detective control, organizations with FortiGate VPNs should implement specific log analysis to hunt for exploitation of CVE-2020-12812. All FortiGate authentication logs should be ingested into a SIEM. A rule must be created to detect the specific signature of this attack: a successful VPN login event where the username recorded in the log (e.g., 'JSmith') does not have the same case as the canonical username in the identity provider (e.g., 'jsmith' in Active Directory). This requires enriching the VPN log with identity data. An alert on this condition is a high-confidence indicator of an active exploitation attempt and should trigger an immediate incident response, including blocking the source IP, terminating the session, and disabling the user account.

Sources & References

Over 10K Fortinet firewalls exposed to actively exploited 2FA bypass
BleepingComputer (bleepingcomputer.com) January 2, 2026
A Forgotten Bug with Dangerous Consequences: Fortinet 2FA Bypass Still Active
IndustryWired (industrywired.com) January 3, 2026
Analysis of FG-IR-19-283
Fortinet (fortinet.com) December 25, 2025

Article Author

Jason Gomes

Jason Gomes

• Cybersecurity Practitioner

Cybersecurity professional with over 10 years of specialized experience in security operations, threat intelligence, incident response, and security automation. Expertise spans SOAR/XSOAR orchestration, threat intelligence platforms, SIEM/UEBA analytics, and building cyber fusion centers. Background includes technical enablement, solution architecture for enterprise and government clients, and implementing security automation workflows across IR, TIP, and SOC use cases.

Threat Intelligence & AnalysisSecurity Orchestration (SOAR/XSOAR)Incident Response & Digital ForensicsSecurity Operations Center (SOC)SIEM & Security AnalyticsCyber Fusion & Threat SharingSecurity Automation & IntegrationManaged Detection & Response (MDR)

Tags

CVE-2020-12812FortinetFortiGateVulnerability2FA BypassKEVPatch ManagementActively Exploited

📢 Share This Article

Help others stay informed about cybersecurity threats

Continue Reading