Over 10,000 organizations exposed
A critical two-factor authentication (2FA) bypass vulnerability in Fortinet FortiGate SSL VPNs, CVE-2020-12812, continues to pose a severe threat despite being five years old. As of January 2, 2026, the Shadowserver Foundation reports that over 10,000 firewalls remain unpatched and publicly exposed. The flaw, with a CVSS score of 9.8, is actively exploited in the wild and allows an attacker who has already obtained a user's password to completely bypass the second authentication factor (FortiToken). The exploit is trivial, requiring the attacker to simply change the case of the username during the login attempt. The vulnerability's persistence highlights a significant failure in patch management across thousands of organizations, leaving critical network gateways open to takeover. The CISA added this flaw to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog in 2022.
Jsmith instead of jsmith), the attacker's login attempt does not match the username configured for 2FA on the FortiGate. The FortiGate therefore does not prompt for a token. However, it then passes the credentials to the LDAP server, which successfully authenticates the user because it ignores the case difference. The result is a successful login with only a single factor.6.4.1, 6.2.4, and 6.0.10.As of early January 2026, over 10,000 vulnerable systems are still online globally, with the highest concentration in the United States (>1,300).
The vulnerability is actively and widely exploited. CISA and the FBI first issued a warning in 2021 that state-sponsored actors were leveraging this flaw. Its inclusion in the CISA KEV catalog underscores its status as a persistent threat used by multiple threat actors to gain initial access to corporate and government networks.
Exploiting CVE-2020-12812 grants an attacker full access to the VPN, effectively placing them inside the target's network perimeter. This has several severe consequences:
| Type | Value | Description | Context | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| log_source | FortiGate VPN Logs | Look for successful authentication events where the user field has a different capitalization than expected for that account. |
SIEM, Log Analysis | high |
| event_id | FortiGate Event ID 40962 | A successful SSL VPN login. Correlate this with user account case and location data. | FortiGate Logs | medium |
| url_pattern | /remote/login |
The login page for the FortiGate SSL VPN. Monitor for brute-force or credential stuffing attempts against this page. | Web Logs, WAF Logs | medium |
JSmith vs jsmith). This is a direct indicator of an exploitation attempt.6.4.1, 6.2.4, 6.0.10 or newer). This is the only way to fully remediate the vulnerability. This is a critical application of D3-SU: Software Update.The primary mitigation is to apply the patches provided by Fortinet immediately. This is a critical patch management failure.
Mapped D3FEND Techniques:
Regularly audit VPN authentication logs for signs of compromise, such as username case mismatches in successful logins.
Even if an attacker gains VPN access, strong internal network segmentation can limit their ability to move laterally and access critical assets.
Mapped D3FEND Techniques:
The existence of over 10,000 unpatched FortiGate devices five years after a patch was released for a critical, actively exploited vulnerability is a catastrophic failure of patch management. The absolute, number one priority for any organization running a vulnerable FortiOS version is to update the software immediately. This is not a suggestion; it is an emergency. All other mitigations are secondary. A robust patch management program for internet-facing devices is non-negotiable. This involves maintaining an accurate asset inventory, subscribing to vendor security advisories, and having a process to test and deploy critical patches within 24-48 hours of release, especially for vulnerabilities listed in CISA's KEV catalog.
Organizations must assume their patch management will fail at some point and have a verification process. Regular, authenticated and unauthenticated vulnerability scanning of the entire external attack surface is essential. For this specific Fortinet issue, an external scan would have immediately flagged CVE-2020-12812. This provides a critical safety net to identify gaps in the patching process. Scanning should be performed at least weekly, and the results should be fed directly into a ticketing system for the network or security team with strict SLAs for remediation of critical findings.
As a detective control, organizations with FortiGate VPNs should implement specific log analysis to hunt for exploitation of CVE-2020-12812. All FortiGate authentication logs should be ingested into a SIEM. A rule must be created to detect the specific signature of this attack: a successful VPN login event where the username recorded in the log (e.g., 'JSmith') does not have the same case as the canonical username in the identity provider (e.g., 'jsmith' in Active Directory). This requires enriching the VPN log with identity data. An alert on this condition is a high-confidence indicator of an active exploitation attempt and should trigger an immediate incident response, including blocking the source IP, terminating the session, and disabling the user account.

Cybersecurity professional with over 10 years of specialized experience in security operations, threat intelligence, incident response, and security automation. Expertise spans SOAR/XSOAR orchestration, threat intelligence platforms, SIEM/UEBA analytics, and building cyber fusion centers. Background includes technical enablement, solution architecture for enterprise and government clients, and implementing security automation workflows across IR, TIP, and SOC use cases.
Help others stay informed about cybersecurity threats